H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marc Rosset vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 3-4

Jeff Tarango holds a 4–3 lead over Marc Rosset in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Marc Rosset leads 2–1 on carpet, while Jeff Tarango leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1999 Moscow quarterfinal 5-7 7-6(4) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marc Rosset
SUI Age 55 Right-Handed 201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 13, 1999* Moscow ATP 250 QF Carpet Jeff Tarango #73 5-7 7-6(4) 6-4 Marc Rosset #37 Match data
Nov 12, 1998* Moscow ATP 250 R32 Carpet Marc Rosset #34 6-4 6-4 Jeff Tarango #71 Match data
Oct 2, 1998* Toulouse ATP 250 R16 Hard Marc Rosset #57 6-3 6-4 Jeff Tarango #73 Match data
Jan 17, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Jeff Tarango #93 6-4 6-1 6-1 Marc Rosset #24 Match data
Nov 9, 1995* Moscow ATP 250 R32 Carpet Marc Rosset #15 7-6(5) 7-6(2) Jeff Tarango #90 Match data
May 17, 1995* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Jeff Tarango #88 7-6(4) 6-3 Marc Rosset #16 Match data
Sep 17, 1994* Bordeaux ATP 250 SF Hard Jeff Tarango #117 6-1 6-3 Marc Rosset #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marc Rosset #1,490 #9 2,069 1,950 398 334 54.4% 0 0 0 0 14 14
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marc Rosset Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 0–1 0.0% #474 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 7–2 77.8% #45 1,613 0 1 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1990 35–23 60.3% #22 1,811 0 2 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1991 18–28 39.1% #60 1,648 0 2 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1992 31–22 58.5% #35 1,826 0 3 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1993 46–21 68.7% #16 1,922 0 6 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1994 46–27 63.0% #14 1,925 0 8 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1995 38–21 64.4% #15 1,814 0 10 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1996 31–27 53.4% #22 1,771 0 10 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1997 32–31 50.8% #31 1,630 0 11 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 1998 27–27 50.0% #31 1,749 0 11 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 1999 26–27 49.1% #45 1,658 0 12 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 2000 31–25 55.4% #28 1,723 0 14 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 2001 12–23 34.3% #119 1,601 0 14 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2002 8–12 40.0% #101 1,597 0 14 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 2003 6–9 40.0% #122 1,586 0 14 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 2004 4–8 33.3% #214 1,546 0 14 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2