H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Marc Rosset vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 3-4

Jeff Tarango holds a 4–3 lead over Marc Rosset in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Marc Rosset leads 2–1 on carpet, while Jeff Tarango leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1999 Moscow quarterfinal 5-7 7-6(4) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marc Rosset
SUI Age 55 Right-Handed 201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeff Tarango #73 5-7 7-6(4) 6-4 Marc Rosset #37 Match data Nov 13, 1999* QF Moscow ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Marc Rosset #34 6-4 6-4 Jeff Tarango #71 Match data Nov 12, 1998* R32 Moscow ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Marc Rosset #57 6-3 6-4 Jeff Tarango #73 Match data Oct 2, 1998* R16 Toulouse ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Jeff Tarango #93 6-4 6-1 6-1 Marc Rosset #24 Match data Jan 17, 1997* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Marc Rosset #15 7-6(5) 7-6(2) Jeff Tarango #90 Match data Nov 9, 1995* R32 Moscow ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Jeff Tarango #88 7-6(4) 6-3 Marc Rosset #16 Match data May 17, 1995* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Jeff Tarango #117 6-1 6-3 Marc Rosset #17 Match data Sep 17, 1994* SF Bordeaux ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marc Rosset #1,490 #9 2,069 1,956 406 335 54.8% 0 1 0 0 2 12 15
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marc Rosset Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 0–1 0.0% #474 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 7–2 77.8% #45 1,613 0 1 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1990 35–23 60.3% #22 1,812 0 2 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1991 18–28 39.1% #60 1,649 0 2 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1992 37–22 62.7% #35 1,879 0 4 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0
22 1993 46–21 68.7% #16 1,942 0 7 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0
23 1994 46–27 63.0% #14 1,931 0 9 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1995 38–21 64.4% #15 1,814 0 11 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1996 33–28 54.1% #22 1,784 0 11 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2
26 1997 32–31 50.8% #31 1,630 0 12 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2
27 1998 27–27 50.0% #31 1,745 0 12 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2
28 1999 26–27 49.1% #45 1,658 0 13 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2
29 2000 31–25 55.4% #28 1,733 0 15 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 2001 12–23 34.3% #119 1,603 0 15 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2002 8–12 40.0% #101 1,598 0 15 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2
32 2003 6–9 40.0% #122 1,587 0 15 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 2004 4–8 33.3% #214 1,547 0 15 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marc Rosset Jeff Tarango
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — — — — — — 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1 6 7 14.3% 22 11 33 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1991 10 9 19 52.6% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1992 15 12 27 55.6% 14 7 21 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 19 5 24 79.2% 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1994 21 14 35 60.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 18 4 22 81.8% 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1995 11 9 20 55.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1996 7 10 17 41.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1997 17 12 29 58.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1998 13 13 26 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
28 1999 13 11 24 54.2% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
29 2000 16 12 28 57.1% 6 8 14 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2001 5 9 14 35.7% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 2002 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 154 134 288 53.5% 112 102 214 52.3% 26 31 57 45.6% 114 68 182 62.6% — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 592/673 of Marc Rosset's and 411/468 of Jeff Tarango's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marc Rosset Jeff Tarango
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 45/46 7.8 3.6 54.9% 77.0% 46.8% 53.3% 32.5% 63.3% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 48/59 8.9 3.8 57.4% 77.3% 50.4% 57.4% 42.5% 66.0% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 62/67 9.9 3.6 58.7% 79.4% 50.7% 65.4% 39.9% 67.5% 38.7% 1991 32/39 1.9 5.1 65.8% 64.8% 46.6% 56.0% 48.7% 58.5% 37.0%
23 1994 66/73 10.0 5.1 57.1% 79.2% 48.8% 64.6% 40.2% 66.3% 38.4% 1992 47/52 3.5 3.5 63.1% 67.5% 47.8% 56.6% 42.3% 60.3% 38.7%
24 1995 50/59 9.3 4.8 55.3% 79.3% 50.6% 63.9% 41.2% 66.6% 37.1% 1993 43/50 3.7 4.6 56.6% 68.4% 47.0% 59.2% 45.1% 59.1% 38.5%
25 1996 48/61 10.9 4.6 58.8% 80.6% 48.5% 63.0% 45.0% 67.5% 35.7% 1994 40/50 3.6 2.2 62.1% 65.8% 51.8% 56.4% 46.6% 60.6% 39.0%
26 1997 54/63 7.7 5.8 55.4% 76.0% 45.8% 57.7% 38.9% 62.7% 37.2% 1995 38/42 4.2 3.7 62.9% 70.3% 49.3% 54.4% 44.8% 62.3% 37.0%
27 1998 48/54 9.6 6.4 54.6% 79.0% 46.3% 50.1% 31.9% 64.3% 35.9% 1996 28/32 5.2 3.2 61.9% 68.0% 50.2% 54.3% 39.3% 61.4% 38.0%
28 1999 47/53 9.9 6.9 53.7% 79.4% 46.8% 63.0% 41.5% 64.5% 36.4% 1997 54/60 3.8 3.5 62.3% 69.2% 51.5% 52.2% 45.0% 62.3% 38.9%
29 2000 49/56 10.0 6.2 57.6% 77.0% 47.8% 55.6% 39.3% 64.3% 36.5% 1998 47/53 4.0 4.2 57.7% 67.9% 52.0% 51.3% 46.8% 61.1% 40.1%
30 2001 30/35 9.4 7.5 56.2% 74.8% 42.5% 60.1% 40.5% 60.7% 32.0% 1999 42/45 4.9 4.1 60.6% 67.1% 46.1% 61.0% 43.2% 58.9% 38.4%
31 2002 18/20 13.6 7.3 57.8% 78.0% 49.5% 63.8% 40.4% 66.0% 32.4% 2000 33/36 4.6 5.3 58.1% 68.9% 47.5% 56.9% 42.2% 60.1% 36.0%
32 2003 15/15 10.3 7.7 56.3% 76.6% 46.2% 64.8% 45.0% 63.4% 33.4% 2001 7/9 3.3 2.1 62.4% 61.8% 52.7% 53.7% 51.2% 58.4% 34.3%
33 2004 12/12 9.2 4.6 58.6% 76.7% 45.3% 51.6% 37.4% 64.2% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 592/741 9.6 5.3 56.5% 78.2% 48.0% 59.9% 39.6% 65.1% 36.4% — 411/534 3.9 3.9 61.0% 67.8% 49.2% 55.7% 44.6% 60.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marc Rosset Jeff Tarango
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1489 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1614 132.6 — — — — — +46 — 73.7% +2.00 1–0 — — +0.48 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19
19 1990 1812 141.5 — — — — -150 -4 -202 54.4% +0.13 18–6 (75%) 17–7 (71%) — +0.66 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) — -0.05
20 1991 1649 138.9 +2.30 -1.77 0.989 49.4% +23 +47 — 45.5% -0.40 3–12 (20%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.07 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12
21 1992 1880 156.4 +3.97 -0.48 1.074 51.0% -52 -9 -248 59.7% +0.63 13–9 (59%) 15–9 (63%) — -4.83 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.35
22 1993 1942 153.8 +5.65 +0.59 1.191 52.8% +30 -111 — 65.8% +0.89 13–7 (65%) 16–12 (57%) — -0.51 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.07
23 1994 1931 148.4 +4.31 +0.54 1.138 51.9% +40 -202 -306 59.7% +0.31 13–10 (57%) 26–12 (68%) — -0.29 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.21
24 1995 1815 145.3 +3.76 -0.37 1.111 51.7% +19 +11 -111 60.8% +0.67 10–7 (59%) 18–15 (55%) — +1.03 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.60
25 1996 1784 147.2 +4.82 -1.13 1.097 51.5% +4 +62 -40 55.5% +0.36 12–13 (48%) 14–14 (50%) — +0.64 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.47
26 1997 1631 133.6 +1.06 -0.88 0.997 49.8% +7 +208 +88 51.3% +0.01 12–8 (60%) 14–15 (48%) — +1.44 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34
27 1998 1745 145.3 +1.96 -0.58 1.005 49.5% +36 -39 -45 50.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 13–11 (54%) — -1.59 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.93
28 1999 1658 138.7 +2.15 -0.73 1.026 50.4% +83 -45 -24 49.6% +0.20 8–8 (50%) 8–15 (35%) — +1.75 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.45
29 2000 1733 140.8 +2.25 -0.56 1.023 50.0% +41 -77 -59 57.2% +0.28 10–9 (53%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.28 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.03
30 2001 1604 126.4 -1.32 -4.04 0.816 46.8% +95 -7 -35 33.7% -0.93 6–4 (60%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.48 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.16
31 2002 1599 127.6 +2.47 -3.30 0.951 49.2% +56 +4 -18 46.9% -0.39 2–4 (33%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.72 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.28
32 2003 1587 123.1 +1.30 -1.92 0.911 48.7% +50 — -17 40.0% -0.77 0–1 7–3 (70%) — -0.48 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01
33 2004 1548 116.7 +0.60 -3.15 0.886 47.7% +75 +9 — 40.7% -0.67 0–3 (0%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.43 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1956 148.8 +2.94 -0.82 1.042 50.5% +22 +2 -83 54.3% +0.21 129–108 (54%) 183–150 (55%) 105.7 -0.42 — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.