H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Marc Rosset vs Jim Grabb H2H: 0-1
Jim Grabb holds a 1–0 lead over Marc Rosset in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Grabb leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1992 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 55
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1992* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jim Grabb | 6-3 6-4 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Rosset | #1,490 | #9 | 2,069 | 1,950 | 398 | 334 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marc Rosset | Jim Grabb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #60 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #35 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #14 | 1,925 | 0 | 8 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,814 | 0 | 10 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,771 | 0 | 10 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 32–31 | 50.8% | #31 | 1,630 | 0 | 11 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #45 | 1,658 | 0 | 12 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 14 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2001 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 14 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2002 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,597 | 0 | 14 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2003 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,586 | 0 | 14 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 14 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 |