H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marc Rosset vs Jonathan Stark H2H: 1-0
Marc Rosset holds a 1–0 lead over Jonathan Stark in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marc Rosset leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marc Rosset won the 1996 Miami Masters second round 4-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 55
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 1996* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marc Rosset | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Jonathan Stark | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Rosset | #1,490 | #9 | 2,069 | 1,950 | 398 | 334 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Jonathan Stark | #829 | #36 | 913 | 1,801 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marc Rosset | Jonathan Stark | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #60 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #243 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #35 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #14 | 1,925 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,814 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,771 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #68 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 32–31 | 50.8% | #31 | 1,630 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #96 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 | 1998 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #266 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1999 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #45 | 1,658 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #300 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 14 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #512 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2001 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 14 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2002 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,597 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,586 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |