H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marc Rosset vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 3-1
Marc Rosset holds a 3–1 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marc Rosset leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1997 Tokyo fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 55
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 1997* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mark Woodforde | 6-2 6-3 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
| Apr 22, 1995* | Nice | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Marc Rosset | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Marc Rosset | 4-6 1-6 6-3 7-6(5) 6-3 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1991* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Marc Rosset | 6-4 6-2 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Rosset | #1,490 | #9 | 2,069 | 1,950 | 398 | 334 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marc Rosset | Mark Woodforde | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #60 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1992 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #35 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #14 | 1,925 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1995 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,814 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1996 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,771 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1997 | 32–31 | 50.8% | #31 | 1,630 | 0 | 11 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1999 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #45 | 1,658 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 14 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2001 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 14 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2002 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,597 | 0 | 14 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2003 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,586 | 0 | 14 | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 14 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 |