H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marc Rosset vs Tomas Zib H2H: 0-1
Tomas Zib holds a 1–0 lead over Marc Rosset in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Zib leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Zib won the 1999 Washington fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 55
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 1999* | Washington | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Tomas Zib | 6-3 6-2 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Rosset | #1,490 | #9 | 2,069 | 1,950 | 398 | 334 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Tomas Zib | #1,339 | #51 | 688 | 1,636 | 41 | 94 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marc Rosset | Tomas Zib | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #60 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #35 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #14 | 1,925 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,814 | 0 | 10 | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,771 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 32–31 | 50.8% | #31 | 1,630 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #45 | 1,658 | 0 | 12 | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 14 | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2001 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 14 | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2002 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,597 | 0 | 14 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2003 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,586 | 0 | 14 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |