H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Marcel Freeman vs Hank Pfister H2H: 1-0

Marcel Freeman holds a 1–0 lead over Hank Pfister in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcel Freeman leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marcel Freeman won the 1983 Australian Open round of 64 6-1 6-7 7-6 6-1.

USA Age 66 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings
USA Age 72 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marcel Freeman 6-1 6-7 7-6 6-1 Hank Pfister #26 Match data Dec 3, 1983* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marcel Freeman #1,111 #46 0 1,713 53 86 38.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hank Pfister #982 #19 0 1,929 260 213 55.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcel Freeman Hank Pfister
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1980 1–5 16.7% #335 1,482 0 0
21 1981 1–3 25.0% 1,478 0 0 1975 0–4 0.0% #252 1,459 0 0
22 1982 0–4 0.0% 1,455 0 0 1976 8–12 40.0% #101 1,546 0 0
23 1983 7–12 36.8% #343 1,519 0 0 1977 37–27 57.8% #40 1,742 0 0
24 1984 13–18 41.9% #116 1,550 0 0 1978 43–26 62.3% #29 1,841 0 0
25 1985 4–8 33.3% #246 1,529 0 0 1979 33–27 55.0% #30 1,842 0 0
26 1986 14–14 50.0% #51 1,673 0 0 1980 21–25 45.7% #62 1,729 0 0
27 1987 12–20 37.5% #161 1,614 0 0 1981 37–21 63.8% #39 1,870 0 1
28 1988 1–2 33.3% #377 1,614 0 0 1982 35–21 62.5% #24 1,832 0 2
29 1983 19–17 52.8% #41 1,750 0 2
30 1984 15–18 45.5% #86 1,723 0 2
31 1985 12–10 54.5% #68 1,764 0 2
33 1987 0–4 0.0% #595 1,678 0 2
34 1988 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marcel Freeman Hank Pfister
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1980 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1976 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 1983 2 5 7 28.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1977 9 6 15 60.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
24 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1978 10 6 16 62.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 14 8 22 63.6%
25 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1979 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 15 11 26 57.7%
26 1986 10 9 19 52.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 8 10 20.0%
27 1987 11 12 23 47.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 22 9 31 71.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
28 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 10 9 19 52.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 20 7 27 74.1% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 1983 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
30 1984 8 6 14 57.1% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
31 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1987 0 4 4 0.0%
34 1988 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 28 41 69 40.6% 13 21 34 38.2% 7 13 20 35.0% 5 11 16 31.2% 95 74 169 56.2% 22 30 52 42.3% 96 53 149 64.4% 47 56 103 45.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marcel Freeman Hank Pfister
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1980 1483 116.8 +89 +4 25.0% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) +0.04
21 1981 1479 109.4 +88 22.2% -1.22 1–2 (33%) +0.08 1975 1459 98.5 +48 20.0% -2.00 0–2 1–0 +0.30
22 1982 1455 112.4 18.2% -1.82 0–2 0–1 -0.34 1976 1547 123.5 +11 -71 +47 45.7% -0.20 3–5 (38%) 2–6 (25%) +1.09
23 1983 1520 119.9 -29 -18 +81 43.4% -0.59 3–6 (33%) 6–3 (67%) +0.22 1977 1743 140.1 -58 -137 +17 54.4% +0.11 14–9 (61%) 8–9 (47%) +0.19
24 1984 1550 117.6 -31 +35 -33 44.3% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 4–8 (33%) +1.97 1978 1841 145.9 0 -227 +11 61.6% +0.92 12–10 (55%) 11–10 (52%) +2.99
25 1985 1529 110.0 -24 +32 36.7% -0.67 3–3 (50%) 2–5 (29%) +1.38 1979 1842 151.6 +8 +56 53.5% +0.39 10–11 (48%) 8–9 (47%) -3.48
26 1986 1674 128.8 -53 -104 -84 50.7% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) -0.47 1980 1730 143.8 -6 -128 +175 46.7% -0.19 7–6 (54%) 8–10 (44%) -3.62
27 1987 1614 128.3 +15 -68 -82 43.7% -0.22 6–11 (35%) 4–8 (33%) +0.12 1981 1870 147.1 -15 -300 +93 61.2% +0.53 9–6 (60%) 14–6 (70%) -1.71
28 1988 1615 115.4 33.3% +0.67 0–2 -0.52 1982 1833 143.2 -50 -232 +127 59.2% +0.47 9–6 (60%) 14–7 (67%) -3.17
29 1983 1751 142.3 +74 +118 50.5% -0.02 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) -3.26
30 1984 1724 131.5 +56 +53 45.8% -0.40 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) -0.93
31 1985 1765 136.6 +34 -33 53.6% +0.43 4–4 (50%) 5–6 (45%) -1.13
33 1987 1679 104.0 +22 10.0% -2.10 0–1 1–2 (33%) +0.12
34 1988 1656 102.6 25.0% -2.00 -0.07
Career 1714 128.5 -13 -3 -33 42.3% -0.46 21–33 (39%) 24–35 (41%) 96.1 +1.78 1930 148.0 +4 -158 +75 53.9% +0.24 82–74 (53%) 81–73 (53%) 103.1 -2.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.