H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Marcel Granollers vs Horacio Zeballos H2H: 2-0
Marcel Granollers holds a 2–0 lead over Horacio Zeballos in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marcel Granollers leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcel Granollers won the 2013 Kitzbuhel fourth round 6-0 2-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 41
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2013* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Marcel Granollers | 6-0 2-0 (ret.) | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2010* | Costa Do Sauipe | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marcel Granollers | 7-5 3-0 (ret.) | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
| May 28, 2007 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q1 | Clay | Marcel Granollers | 6-3 6-4 | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcel Granollers | #1,009 | #19 | 1,635 | 1,934 | 202 | 245 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Horacio Zeballos | #841 | #39 | 1,027 | 1,876 | 87 | 131 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcel Granollers | Horacio Zeballos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #56 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2009 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2010 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #27 | 1,897 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #109 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #38 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #85 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #46 | 1,781 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #56 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2015 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #123 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2016 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #37 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2017 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #177 | 1,702 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #71 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2018 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,677 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2019 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,724 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #173 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 39 | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |