H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcel Granollers vs Igor Andreev H2H: 1-2
Igor Andreev holds a 2–1 lead over Marcel Granollers in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Igor Andreev won the 2011 St. Petersburg third round 3-6 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2011* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Igor Andreev | 3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | Marcel Granollers | Match data |
| Jul 29, 2011* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Marcel Granollers | 6-1 6-3 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2010* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Igor Andreev | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Marcel Granollers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcel Granollers | #1,009 | #19 | 1,635 | 1,934 | 202 | 245 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcel Granollers | Igor Andreev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2008 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #56 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2009 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2010 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2011 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #27 | 1,897 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2012 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #38 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2014 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #46 | 1,781 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2015 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2016 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #37 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #177 | 1,702 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,677 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,724 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |