H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Marcel Granollers vs Mate Pavic H2H: 1-0
Marcel Granollers holds a 1–0 lead over Mate Pavic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcel Granollers leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcel Granollers won the 2013 Kitzbuhel third round 7-6(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 33
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2013* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marcel Granollers | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Mate Pavic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcel Granollers | #1,009 | #19 | 1,635 | 1,934 | 202 | 245 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Mate Pavic | #974 | #295 | 150 | 1,611 | 3 | 10 | 23.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcel Granollers | Mate Pavic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #369 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #412 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #423 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #638 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #56 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2009 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #933 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2011 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #27 | 1,897 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2012 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #38 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2014 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #46 | 1,781 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #37 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #177 | 1,702 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,677 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,724 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |