H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Marco Cecchinato vs Benoit Paire H2H: 0-1

Benoit Paire holds a 1–0 lead over Marco Cecchinato in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Benoit Paire leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Benoit Paire won the 2019 Shanghai Masters first round 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marco Cecchinato
Italy Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Benoit Paire
France Age 37 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Benoit Paire #23 6-2 7-5 Marco Cecchinato #69 Match data Oct 8, 2019* R64 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Benoit Paire #39 6-1 6-1 Marco Cecchinato #102 Match data Aug 16, 2015 Q1 Q Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marco Cecchinato #166 #16 2,091 1,903 79 128 38.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Benoit Paire #862 #18 1,805 1,951 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marco Cecchinato Benoit Paire
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2013 0–1 0.0% #163 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2014 0–3 0.0% #159 1,586 0 0 2010 1–4 20.0% #152 1,586 0 0
22 2015 0–4 0.0% #90 1,556 0 0 2011 5–10 33.3% #95 1,603 0 0
23 2016 2–10 16.7% #187 1,562 0 0 2012 26–26 50.0% #47 1,781 0 0
24 2017 1–5 16.7% #109 1,559 0 0 2013 32–30 51.6% #26 1,786 0 0
25 2018 23–23 50.0% #20 1,771 0 2 2014 10–19 34.5% #118 1,718 0 0
26 2019 14–25 35.9% #71 1,644 0 3 2015 25–17 59.5% #19 1,924 0 1
27 2020 8–13 38.1% #80 1,762 0 3 2016 23–32 41.8% #47 1,716 0 1
28 2021 16–21 43.2% #100 1,680 0 3 2017 31–31 50.0% #41 1,785 0 1
29 2022 4–7 36.4% #101 1,642 0 3 2018 26–28 48.1% #52 1,811 0 1
30 2023 11–15 42.3% #198 1,609 0 3 2019 34–28 54.8% #24 1,818 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2020 8–12 40.0% #28 1,709 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2021 13–28 31.7% #46 1,659 0 3
33 2026 0–1 0.0% #166 1,557 0 3 2022 4–22 15.4% #179 1,594 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2023 0–4 0.0% #117 1,585 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2024 2–3 40.0% #415 1,508 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marco Cecchinato Benoit Paire
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 2012 9 14 23 39.1% 12 10 22 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4%
24 2017 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 16 17 33 48.5% 13 10 23 56.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2018 4 11 15 26.7% 17 10 27 63.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 2019 5 12 17 29.4% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2015 12 9 21 57.1% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2020 1 6 7 14.3% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 2016 13 20 33 39.4% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2021 1 6 7 14.3% 15 14 29 51.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 17 18 35 48.6% 8 10 18 44.4% 6 3 9 66.7%
29 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 2018 17 17 34 50.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 2023 1 3 4 25.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2019 16 20 36 44.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 7 14 21 33.3% 6 12 18 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 2026 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2022 3 10 13 23.1% 1 10 11 9.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 12 43 55 21.8% 65 76 141 46.1% 2 9 11 18.2% — 129 165 294 43.9% 87 101 188 46.3% 24 28 52 46.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 205/207 of Marco Cecchinato's and 532/534 of Benoit Paire's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marco Cecchinato Benoit Paire
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2013 1/1 2.0 1.0 71.8% 55.4% 50.0% 54.5% 60.0% 53.8% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 3/3 2.3 2.3 60.7% 66.3% 48.6% 33.3% 22.9% 59.3% 34.1% 2010 5/5 14.0 6.0 52.0% 73.0% 44.6% 60.9% 36.7% 59.4% 32.3%
22 2015 4/4 4.5 3.5 61.2% 64.6% 42.1% 35.3% 59.0% 55.1% 28.4% 2011 15/15 5.7 3.6 51.3% 70.3% 45.8% 46.5% 42.7% 58.3% 36.8%
23 2016 12/12 2.4 1.9 63.1% 64.4% 47.6% 57.9% 25.6% 58.1% 30.5% 2012 52/52 7.4 4.5 51.7% 72.8% 46.8% 55.1% 38.9% 60.4% 39.6%
24 2017 6/6 2.3 3.3 66.4% 65.3% 37.7% 38.8% 24.6% 56.4% 34.3% 2013 62/62 8.7 3.8 52.4% 74.0% 47.2% 56.0% 41.6% 61.4% 38.4%
25 2018 46/46 5.4 2.6 68.4% 69.2% 48.7% 56.5% 36.6% 62.6% 34.4% 2014 29/29 9.9 4.5 51.5% 76.0% 45.2% 59.3% 40.4% 60.3% 35.9%
26 2019 37/39 4.8 2.7 63.6% 69.9% 49.6% 53.2% 45.5% 62.6% 34.9% 2015 42/42 7.5 4.0 52.4% 72.9% 48.6% 57.9% 46.7% 61.2% 38.6%
27 2020 21/21 4.7 2.3 66.3% 67.3% 50.4% 53.0% 36.5% 61.5% 34.0% 2016 53/55 7.9 4.7 49.6% 72.4% 46.1% 56.7% 40.9% 59.3% 37.0%
28 2021 37/37 4.2 2.6 66.8% 68.5% 51.2% 58.1% 35.7% 62.7% 36.6% 2017 62/62 8.3 4.6 52.3% 75.6% 46.2% 56.8% 47.3% 61.5% 38.8%
29 2022 11/11 2.3 2.0 66.1% 63.5% 45.4% 54.8% 37.9% 57.3% 33.6% 2018 54/54 8.9 5.5 51.0% 76.1% 44.4% 54.3% 42.8% 60.4% 38.2%
30 2023 26/26 3.7 2.8 60.5% 65.3% 50.8% 60.3% 47.8% 59.9% 33.2% 2019 62/62 9.8 6.6 51.7% 78.4% 45.7% 60.2% 41.1% 62.7% 36.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 20/20 9.8 6.2 52.9% 71.6% 43.2% 56.6% 39.1% 58.3% 35.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 41/41 8.5 7.5 52.9% 73.6% 40.1% 57.1% 43.9% 58.0% 35.8%
33 2026 1/1 1.0 2.0 68.0% 53.0% 22.0% 29.0% 40.0% 43.0% 36.0% 2022 26/26 7.4 7.8 50.9% 71.2% 39.3% 49.6% 31.7% 55.6% 34.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 4/4 10.8 9.5 54.2% 71.6% 41.8% 55.9% 33.5% 58.3% 33.3%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 5/5 6.6 7.2 57.5% 73.1% 39.0% 48.0% 37.5% 58.7% 38.4%
Career — 205/207 4.2 2.6 65.3% 67.6% 49.0% 54.9% 38.9% 61.1% 34.3% — 532/534 8.5 5.3 51.8% 74.3% 45.2% 56.2% 41.8% 60.3% 37.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marco Cecchinato Benoit Paire
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2012 1512 99.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1471 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 1587 115.3 +3.04 -2.45 0.920 48.3% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.19 2009 1493 103.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 1586 117.0 -0.42 -2.53 0.839 46.5% — +93 — 25.0% -1.25 0–2 1–1 — -0.24 2010 1586 118.3 -2.12 -0.94 0.796 46.5% -23 — — 33.3% -0.89 1–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.04
22 2015 1556 113.7 -2.52 -4.09 0.631 42.5% — — — 25.0% -2.00 0–2 1–0 — 0.00 2011 1603 123.4 -3.06 +0.10 0.882 47.5% -3 +27 — 35.0% -0.77 3–1 (75%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.13
23 2016 1563 122.3 -2.06 -2.65 0.728 44.8% — +72 — 24.1% -1.76 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.78 2012 1782 142.4 -1.71 +1.64 0.998 49.9% -102 -34 -102 49.6% -0.07 9–9 (50%) 11–14 (44%) — -0.08
24 2017 1559 113.8 -1.75 -1.90 0.787 45.2% — +102 — 20.0% -1.74 1–1 0–2 — +0.15 2013 1786 157.4 -1.15 +1.47 0.993 50.0% -35 +83 -99 53.3% +0.10 9–11 (45%) 16–12 (57%) — +1.43
25 2018 1772 145.9 -0.08 -1.47 0.919 49.0% -301 +201 -151 47.1% -0.22 11–4 (73%) 13–11 (54%) — -0.46 2014 1718 134.7 -2.95 -1.19 0.905 48.0% +51 +26 -117 42.3% -0.28 5–7 (42%) 5–13 (28%) — +0.67
26 2019 1645 142.3 -0.33 -1.36 0.932 48.8% -133 +194 -84 38.0% -0.71 3–12 (20%) 8–11 (42%) — +0.50 2015 1925 154.1 -1.52 +2.40 0.997 50.1% -34 +9 -319 55.0% +0.20 12–5 (71%) 9–3 (75%) — -0.04
27 2020 1762 135.4 -0.70 -1.93 0.881 48.1% -218 +106 — 37.0% -0.54 4–2 (67%) 7–5 (58%) — -0.55 2016 1716 146.7 -3.57 +0.24 0.910 48.0% +10 +122 -135 43.2% -0.58 12–13 (48%) 10–13 (43%) — +2.19
28 2021 1681 131.3 -0.53 -0.56 0.983 49.8% -210 +142 — 45.3% -0.33 4–8 (33%) 7–3 (70%) — -0.29 2017 1785 155.3 -2.05 +2.27 1.008 50.0% -17 +10 -39 51.7% +0.01 5–11 (31%) 17–9 (65%) — +1.95
29 2022 1643 117.9 -3.04 -2.10 0.787 46.4% — +100 — 34.5% -0.76 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.20 2018 1812 153.2 -1.98 +2.17 0.965 49.3% -13 -26 +8 48.6% -0.23 10–11 (48%) 16–12 (57%) — -1.92
30 2023 1610 118.7 -2.90 -2.81 0.827 47.5% -187 +81 — 41.7% -0.82 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.21 2019 1819 150.0 -1.37 +1.15 0.989 49.8% -72 +114 +30 51.9% +0.04 11–11 (50%) 16–13 (55%) — -0.26
31 2024 1576 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1710 127.4 -3.57 -0.47 0.857 47.1% -1 +130 — 45.3% -0.36 6–4 (60%) 4–7 (36%) — +1.03
32 2025 1560 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1659 142.0 -3.78 -1.03 0.851 47.3% +15 +77 — 36.2% -0.96 4–9 (31%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.03
33 2026 1557 108.0 +1.69 -2.78 0.632 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.04 2022 1594 131.2 -5.62 -1.88 0.767 45.2% +64 +14 — 28.4% -1.51 2–6 (25%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.83
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1585 113.0 -2.53 -0.35 0.797 46.6% — -8 — 25.0% -1.25 0–2 0–2 — -0.19
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1508 101.4 -2.39 -0.60 0.929 48.2% — — — 38.5% -0.85 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.34
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1493 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1904 133.9 -0.98 -1.70 0.883 48.1% -210 +138 -122 39.6% -0.67 29–37 (44%) 45–40 (53%) 102.3 -0.69 — 1951 150.1 -2.39 +0.90 0.942 48.9% -20 +44 -71 46.6% -0.28 91–102 (47%) 120–117 (51%) 103.5 +0.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.