H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marco Cecchinato vs Denis Istomin H2H: 1-0
Marco Cecchinato holds a 1–0 lead over Denis Istomin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marco Cecchinato leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marco Cecchinato won the 2018 Eastbourne fourth round 4-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 33
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2018* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Marco Cecchinato | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Denis Istomin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marco Cecchinato | #175 | #16 | 2,091 | 1,903 | 79 | 128 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Denis Istomin | #1,509 | #33 | 1,217 | 1,900 | 191 | 245 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marco Cecchinato | Denis Istomin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #102 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #187 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #73 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #20 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #43 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #45 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #80 | 1,764 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #100 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #61 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2022 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #101 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #121 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #198 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #177 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,577 | 0 | 2 |