H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Marco Cecchinato vs Jiri Vesely H2H: 1-0
Marco Cecchinato holds a 1–0 lead over Jiri Vesely in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marco Cecchinato leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marco Cecchinato won the 2018 Umag fourth round 2-6 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 33
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Czechia
Age 33
Left-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2018* | Umag | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Marco Cecchinato | 2-6 7-5 7-5 | Jiri Vesely | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marco Cecchinato | #175 | #16 | 2,091 | 1,903 | 79 | 128 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jiri Vesely | #1,213 | #35 | 1,125 | 1,924 | 129 | 160 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marco Cecchinato | Jiri Vesely | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #85 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #66 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2015 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2016 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #187 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #62 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #89 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #20 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #105 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #68 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #80 | 1,764 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,629 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2021 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #100 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2022 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #101 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #292 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #198 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |