H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Marco Cecchinato vs Kyle Edmund H2H: 1-0
Marco Cecchinato holds a 1–0 lead over Kyle Edmund in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marco Cecchinato leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marco Cecchinato won the 2020 Rome Masters second round 3-6 7-6(7) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 33
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2020* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Marco Cecchinato | 3-6 7-6(7) 6-2 | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
| May 16, 2016 | Nice | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Kyle Edmund | 6-3 6-4 | Marco Cecchinato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marco Cecchinato | #175 | #16 | 2,091 | 1,903 | 79 | 128 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marco Cecchinato | Kyle Edmund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #187 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #20 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2019 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #80 | 1,764 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2021 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #100 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2022 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #101 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #198 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |