H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marco Cecchinato vs Nick Kyrgios H2H: 0-1
Nick Kyrgios holds a 1–0 lead over Marco Cecchinato in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nick Kyrgios leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nick Kyrgios won the 2016 Roland Garros first round 7-6(6) 7-6(6) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 33
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 31
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Nick Kyrgios | 7-6(6) 7-6(6) 6-4 | Marco Cecchinato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marco Cecchinato | #175 | #16 | 2,091 | 1,903 | 79 | 128 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Nick Kyrgios | #670 | #13 | 2,460 | 2,153 | 197 | 115 | 63.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marco Cecchinato | Nick Kyrgios | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #13 | 2,058 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2015 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,986 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2016 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #187 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #35 | 1,965 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #20 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #45 | 1,951 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2019 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,878 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #80 | 1,764 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #22 | 2,096 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2021 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #100 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2022 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #101 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #198 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #671 | 1,969 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #670 | 1,896 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |