H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marco Cecchinato vs Paolo Lorenzi H2H: 0-1
Paolo Lorenzi holds a 1–0 lead over Marco Cecchinato in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paolo Lorenzi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paolo Lorenzi won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro third round 6-4 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 33
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2016* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Paolo Lorenzi | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Marco Cecchinato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marco Cecchinato | #175 | #16 | 2,091 | 1,903 | 79 | 128 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Paolo Lorenzi | #1,033 | #33 | 1,223 | 1,823 | 104 | 180 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marco Cecchinato | Paolo Lorenzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #187 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #20 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #294 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #80 | 1,764 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #84 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #100 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #143 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #101 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #198 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #109 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 |