H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marco Cecchinato vs Rajeev Ram
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Marco Cecchinato vs Rajeev Ram.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 33
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
USA
Age 42
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marco Cecchinato | #175 | #16 | 2,091 | 1,903 | 79 | 128 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Rajeev Ram | #1,076 | #56 | 826 | 1,747 | 57 | 94 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marco Cecchinato | Rajeev Ram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #536 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #437 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #297 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #187 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #20 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #80 | 1,764 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #149 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2021 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #100 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #132 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2022 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #101 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #127 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #198 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #139 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #89 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #129 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #353 | 1,582 | 0 | 2 |