H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Marco Cecchinato vs Richard Gasquet H2H: 1-1

Marco Cecchinato and Richard Gasquet are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marco Cecchinato leads 1–0 on clay, while Richard Gasquet leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marco Cecchinato won the 2021 Swedish Open first round 6-2 5-7 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marco Cecchinato
Italy Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marco Cecchinato #82 6-2 5-7 6-3 Richard Gasquet #54 Match data Jul 15, 2021* R32 Swedish Open ATP 250 Clay
Richard Gasquet #49 6-4 6-2 Marco Cecchinato #89 Match data Mar 16, 2021* R64 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marco Cecchinato #166 #16 2,091 1,903 79 128 38.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marco Cecchinato Richard Gasquet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1
20 2013 0–1 0.0% #163 1,587 0 0 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4
21 2014 0–3 0.0% #159 1,586 0 0 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5
22 2015 0–4 0.0% #90 1,556 0 0 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5
23 2016 2–10 16.7% #187 1,562 0 0 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5
24 2017 1–5 16.7% #109 1,559 0 0 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6
25 2018 23–23 50.0% #20 1,771 0 2 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6
26 2019 14–25 35.9% #71 1,644 0 3 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7
27 2020 8–13 38.1% #80 1,762 0 3 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10
28 2021 16–21 43.2% #100 1,680 0 3 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10
29 2022 4–7 36.4% #101 1,642 0 3 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12
30 2023 11–15 42.3% #198 1,609 0 3 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14
32 — — — — — — — 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15
33 2026 0–1 0.0% #166 1,557 0 3 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15
34 — — — — — — — 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15
35 — — — — — — — 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16
38 — — — — — — — 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16
39 — — — — — — — 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marco Cecchinato Richard Gasquet
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
20 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
21 2014 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2017 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2018 4 11 15 26.7% 17 10 27 63.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
26 2019 5 12 17 29.4% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 2020 1 6 7 14.3% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2021 1 6 7 14.3% 15 14 29 51.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
29 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
30 2023 1 3 4 25.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
33 2026 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 43 55 21.8% 65 76 141 46.1% 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 205/207 of Marco Cecchinato's and 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marco Cecchinato Richard Gasquet
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6%
20 2013 1/1 2.0 1.0 71.8% 55.4% 50.0% 54.5% 60.0% 53.8% 42.5% 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2%
21 2014 3/3 2.3 2.3 60.7% 66.3% 48.6% 33.3% 22.9% 59.3% 34.1% 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6%
22 2015 4/4 4.5 3.5 61.2% 64.6% 42.1% 35.3% 59.0% 55.1% 28.4% 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7%
23 2016 12/12 2.4 1.9 63.1% 64.4% 47.6% 57.9% 25.6% 58.1% 30.5% 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1%
24 2017 6/6 2.3 3.3 66.4% 65.3% 37.7% 38.8% 24.6% 56.4% 34.3% 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8%
25 2018 46/46 5.4 2.6 68.4% 69.2% 48.7% 56.5% 36.6% 62.6% 34.4% 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9%
26 2019 37/39 4.8 2.7 63.6% 69.9% 49.6% 53.2% 45.5% 62.6% 34.9% 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1%
27 2020 21/21 4.7 2.3 66.3% 67.3% 50.4% 53.0% 36.5% 61.5% 34.0% 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5%
28 2021 37/37 4.2 2.6 66.8% 68.5% 51.2% 58.1% 35.7% 62.7% 36.6% 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0%
29 2022 11/11 2.3 2.0 66.1% 63.5% 45.4% 54.8% 37.9% 57.3% 33.6% 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6%
30 2023 26/26 3.7 2.8 60.5% 65.3% 50.8% 60.3% 47.8% 59.9% 33.2% 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8%
33 2026 1/1 1.0 2.0 68.0% 53.0% 22.0% 29.0% 40.0% 43.0% 36.0% 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3%
Career — 205/207 4.2 2.6 65.3% 67.6% 49.0% 54.9% 38.9% 61.1% 34.3% — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marco Cecchinato Richard Gasquet
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) 98.0 +0.35
19 2012 1512 99.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) 111.0 +1.52
20 2013 1587 115.3 +3.04 -2.45 0.920 48.3% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.19 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) 103.9 -1.51
21 2014 1586 117.0 -0.42 -2.53 0.839 46.5% — +93 — 25.0% -1.25 0–2 1–1 — -0.24 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) 97.0 +1.61
22 2015 1556 113.7 -2.52 -4.09 0.631 42.5% — — — 25.0% -2.00 0–2 1–0 — 0.00 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 91.6 +0.90
23 2016 1563 122.3 -2.06 -2.65 0.728 44.8% — +72 — 24.1% -1.76 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.78 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 104.5 -0.85
24 2017 1559 113.8 -1.75 -1.90 0.787 45.2% — +102 — 20.0% -1.74 1–1 0–2 — +0.15 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) 100.5 0.00
25 2018 1772 145.9 -0.08 -1.47 0.919 49.0% -301 +201 -151 47.1% -0.22 11–4 (73%) 13–11 (54%) 114.5 -0.46 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) 106.4 +0.44
26 2019 1645 142.3 -0.33 -1.36 0.932 48.8% -133 +194 -84 38.0% -0.71 3–12 (20%) 8–11 (42%) 91.7 +0.50 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) 98.3 +2.77
27 2020 1762 135.4 -0.70 -1.93 0.881 48.1% -218 +106 — 37.0% -0.54 4–2 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 103.9 -0.55 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) 101.5 +2.10
28 2021 1681 131.3 -0.53 -0.56 0.983 49.8% -210 +142 — 45.3% -0.33 4–8 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 97.3 -0.29 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) 103.8 +1.40
29 2022 1643 117.9 -3.04 -2.10 0.787 46.4% — +100 — 34.5% -0.76 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.9 +0.20 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) 103.2 -2.22
30 2023 1610 118.7 -2.90 -2.81 0.827 47.5% -187 +81 — 41.7% -0.82 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 104.0 +0.21 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) 103.0 +1.59
31 2024 1576 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) 99.0 -0.72
32 2025 1560 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 -0.58
33 2026 1557 108.0 +1.66 -2.75 0.632 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.04 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) 100.3 -0.68
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -0.26
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 99.3 -0.21
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) 99.4 -2.39
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 101.0 +0.23
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03
Career — 1904 133.9 -0.98 -1.70 0.883 48.1% -210 +138 -122 39.6% -0.67 29–37 (44%) 45–40 (53%) 102.3 -0.69 — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.