H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marcos Baghdatis vs Albert Portas H2H: 1-0
Marcos Baghdatis holds a 1–0 lead over Albert Portas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcos Baghdatis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2006 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CYP
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2006* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Marcos Baghdatis | 6-4 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 | Albert Portas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcos Baghdatis | #179 | #8 | 2,111 | 1,952 | 324 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcos Baghdatis | Albert Portas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #98 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #42 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #44 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,897 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2013 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #87 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #85 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2015 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #46 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2016 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,884 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2017 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2018 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #124 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #179 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |