H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcos Baghdatis vs Alejandro Falla H2H: 3-0
Marcos Baghdatis holds a 3–0 lead over Alejandro Falla in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marcos Baghdatis leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2012 Stockholm fourth round 6-0 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CYP
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
COL
Age 42
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2012* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marcos Baghdatis | 6-0 3-0 (ret.) | Alejandro Falla | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2012* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marcos Baghdatis | 6-4 6-1 | Alejandro Falla | Match data |
| May 3, 2011* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Marcos Baghdatis | 6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | Alejandro Falla | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcos Baghdatis | #179 | #8 | 2,111 | 1,952 | 324 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Alejandro Falla | #646 | #50 | 869 | 1,813 | 97 | 158 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcos Baghdatis | Alejandro Falla | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #98 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #42 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #180 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #81 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #44 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #105 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,897 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #74 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #87 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #54 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #85 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #99 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #46 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #88 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,884 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #122 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2017 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2018 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #124 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #397 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #179 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |