H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 19:16 UTC
Marcos Baghdatis vs Alejandro Gomez Gb42 H2H: 0-1
Alejandro Gomez Gb42 holds a 1–0 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alejandro Gomez Gb42 leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alejandro Gomez Gb42 won the 2015 Bogota third round 6-3 0-6 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CYP
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2015* | Bogota | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Alejandro Gomez Gb42 | 6-3 0-6 7-6(3) | Marcos Baghdatis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcos Baghdatis | #179 | #8 | 2,111 | 1,952 | 324 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Alejandro Gomez Gb42 | — | — | — | 1,577 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marcos Baghdatis | Alejandro Gomez Gb42 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #98 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #42 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #44 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,897 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #87 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #85 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #46 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,884 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #124 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #179 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |