H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Marcos Baghdatis vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 5-2

Marcos Baghdatis holds a 5–2 lead over Ernests Gulbis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Marcos Baghdatis leads 4–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2015 St. Petersburg third round 6-4 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marcos Baghdatis
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Ernests Gulbis
LAT Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 24, 2015* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R32 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #52 6-4 4-6 6-3 Ernests Gulbis #68 Match data
Jun 13, 2013* Halle ATP 500 R32 Grass Ernests Gulbis #38 6-4 3-6 6-3 Marcos Baghdatis #40 Match data
Apr 27, 2010* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Ernests Gulbis #40 6-2 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #33 Match data
Mar 27, 2009* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #105 6-2 6-2 Ernests Gulbis #43 Match data
Feb 26, 2009* Delray Beach ATP 250 R32 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #100 7-5 6-2 Ernests Gulbis #42 Match data
Jun 27, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Marcos Baghdatis #16 3-6 6-4 6-3 6-2 Ernests Gulbis #82 Match data
Jan 11, 2007* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #11 7-6(3) 6-1 Ernests Gulbis #141 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,139 221 232 48.8% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcos Baghdatis Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0 2008 22–20 52.4% #53 1,815 0 0
20 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,696 0 0
21 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,845 0 1
22 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,774 0 2
23 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,727 0 2
24 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,939 0 4
25 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,917 0 6
26 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,716 0 6
29 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,813 0 6
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,533 0 6
31 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,562 0 6
32 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6
33 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4 — — — — — — —