H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marcos Baghdatis vs Gilles Muller H2H: 3-2

Marcos Baghdatis holds a 3–2 lead over Gilles Muller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Marcos Baghdatis leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gilles Muller won the 2018 Newport third round 7-6(5) 6-3.

CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 19, 2018* Newport ATP 250 R32 Grass Gilles Muller #95 7-6(5) 6-3 Marcos Baghdatis #96 Match data
Oct 7, 2016* Tokyo ATP 500 R16 Hard Gilles Muller #36 6-3 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #35 Match data
May 24, 2016* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Marcos Baghdatis #39 7-5 6-4 6-1 Gilles Muller #42 Match data
Oct 24, 2015* Stockholm ATP 250 QF Hard Marcos Baghdatis #46 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 Gilles Muller #37 Match data
Aug 1, 2015* Atlanta ATP 250 SF Hard Marcos Baghdatis #47 6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(4) Gilles Muller #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,071 200 199 50.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcos Baghdatis Gilles Muller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0
20 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0
21 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,599 0 0
22 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,727 0 0
23 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,535 0 0
24 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,578 0 0
25 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,675 0 0
26 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,634 0 0
27 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,612 0 0
28 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0
29 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4 2012 20–20 50.0% #67 1,834 0 0
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4 2013 2–7 22.2% #368 1,691 0 0
31 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,743 0 0
32 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,893 0 0
33 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4 2016 33–23 58.9% #34 1,956 0 0
34 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,939 0 2
35 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,687 0 2