H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marcos Baghdatis vs Leonardo Mayer H2H: 1-3
Leonardo Mayer holds a 3–1 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Leonardo Mayer leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Leonardo Mayer won the 2014 Wimbledon second round 7-6(4) 4-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CYP
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Leonardo Mayer | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Marcos Baghdatis | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2012* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Marcos Baghdatis | 6-1 6-4 | Leonardo Mayer | Match data |
| May 26, 2011* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Leonardo Mayer | 7-5 6-4 7-6(6) | Marcos Baghdatis | Match data |
| May 21, 2010* | Nice | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Leonardo Mayer | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | Marcos Baghdatis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcos Baghdatis | #179 | #8 | 2,111 | 1,952 | 324 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Leonardo Mayer | #748 | #21 | 1,605 | 1,937 | 166 | 194 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcos Baghdatis | Leonardo Mayer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #98 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #42 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #78 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #44 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,897 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2013 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #87 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #85 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #139 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2015 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #46 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #52 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2016 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,884 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2017 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #92 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2018 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #124 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #179 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,520 | 0 | 2 |