H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Marcos Baghdatis vs Leonardo Mayer H2H: 1-3

Leonardo Mayer holds a 3–1 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Leonardo Mayer leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Leonardo Mayer won the 2014 Wimbledon second round 7-6(4) 4-6 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marcos Baghdatis
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Leonardo Mayer
ARG Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leonardo Mayer #64 7-6(4) 4-6 6-1 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #119 Match data Jun 26, 2014* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Marcos Baghdatis #42 6-1 6-4 Leonardo Mayer #77 Match data Mar 23, 2012* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Leonardo Mayer #217 7-5 6-4 7-6(6) Marcos Baghdatis #29 Match data May 26, 2011* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Leonardo Mayer #59 5-7 6-3 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #29 Match data May 21, 2010* QF Nice ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 327 274 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Leonardo Mayer #748 #21 1,605 1,938 166 194 46.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcos Baghdatis Leonardo Mayer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2004 2–2 50.0% #159 1,576 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,699 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1 2008 1–1 50.0% #115 1,476 0 0
22 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,938 0 2 2009 18–18 50.0% #75 1,664 0 0
23 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,814 0 2 2010 12–19 38.7% #94 1,652 0 0
24 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,784 0 3 2011 4–7 36.4% #78 1,676 0 0
25 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,851 0 4 2012 11–14 44.0% #71 1,726 0 0
26 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4 2013 12–18 40.0% #94 1,718 0 0
27 2012 33–25 56.9% #36 1,908 0 4 2014 26–20 56.5% #28 1,832 0 1
28 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,806 0 4 2015 24–23 51.1% #35 1,839 0 1
29 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,704 0 4 2016 9–15 37.5% #139 1,729 0 1
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,870 0 4 2017 11–8 57.9% #52 1,796 0 2
31 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4 2018 22–25 46.8% #56 1,747 0 2
32 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4 2019 16–18 47.1% #92 1,710 0 2
33 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,728 0 4 2020 0–7 0.0% #135 1,605 0 2
34 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,743 0 4 2021 0–1 0.0% #309 1,520 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marcos Baghdatis Leonardo Mayer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 22 12 34 64.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2007 23 15 38 60.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 2009 11 11 22 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2008 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2009 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2010 33 18 51 64.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2011 18 18 36 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2013 3 6 9 33.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2012 24 16 40 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2014 5 9 14 35.7% 18 10 28 64.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
28 2013 14 15 29 48.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2015 10 12 22 45.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2015 17 13 30 56.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2017 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2016 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2018 9 12 21 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
32 2017 14 10 24 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2019 6 6 12 50.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2018 11 11 22 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2020 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2019 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2021 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 233 182 415 56.1% 30 50 80 37.5% 55 40 95 57.9% 9 2 11 81.8% — 63 91 154 40.9% 87 84 171 50.9% 16 19 35 45.7% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 594/601 of Marcos Baghdatis's and 358/360 of Leonardo Mayer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marcos Baghdatis Leonardo Mayer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2004 2/4 11.5 7.5 51.4% 71.0% 41.1% 18.3% 61.4% 56.3% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 23/23 7.5 2.6 56.7% 73.2% 52.6% 55.8% 51.8% 64.3% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 53/53 7.4 3.3 52.5% 74.5% 50.5% 54.0% 44.4% 62.8% 40.2% 2008 2/2 7.5 3.5 52.5% 86.6% 51.5% 12.5% 33.3% 69.5% 35.8%
22 2007 66/66 6.8 2.7 52.6% 75.1% 54.2% 61.3% 46.5% 65.0% 39.2% 2009 35/36 6.6 2.6 59.4% 75.3% 53.0% 56.0% 38.7% 66.4% 37.7%
23 2008 24/24 8.2 3.8 54.0% 77.5% 53.3% 57.0% 35.8% 66.3% 35.2% 2010 31/31 6.8 3.3 61.3% 73.8% 51.3% 64.9% 46.1% 65.1% 32.4%
24 2009 33/34 7.2 3.0 52.8% 75.2% 51.2% 56.2% 43.9% 63.7% 39.4% 2011 11/11 3.1 2.8 61.4% 69.3% 55.2% 46.1% 36.0% 63.9% 32.3%
25 2010 68/68 7.3 2.9 51.3% 75.9% 52.1% 57.6% 43.5% 64.5% 38.6% 2012 25/25 6.7 4.0 59.3% 72.1% 51.5% 57.8% 37.7% 63.6% 32.1%
26 2011 53/53 7.5 2.9 51.3% 76.4% 51.0% 59.2% 46.0% 63.9% 36.7% 2013 29/30 4.7 3.7 61.7% 68.6% 50.0% 58.6% 49.2% 61.4% 34.2%
27 2012 55/58 6.3 3.1 54.7% 73.6% 52.4% 54.6% 43.1% 64.2% 37.9% 2014 46/46 6.6 4.1 59.7% 74.5% 53.7% 57.6% 42.4% 66.4% 36.4%
28 2013 36/36 7.6 4.3 53.0% 75.3% 51.9% 64.0% 39.1% 64.1% 34.4% 2015 47/47 6.7 3.0 63.8% 74.8% 54.2% 65.0% 36.3% 67.4% 35.1%
29 2014 18/18 6.4 4.6 52.0% 74.5% 50.3% 45.3% 45.3% 63.0% 35.2% 2016 24/24 4.7 3.5 61.8% 71.4% 48.5% 62.3% 38.0% 62.4% 35.9%
30 2015 45/45 7.8 3.6 54.5% 74.1% 51.1% 58.0% 45.4% 63.6% 37.6% 2017 19/19 6.7 2.7 61.7% 67.4% 53.7% 48.8% 34.0% 63.2% 34.1%
31 2016 49/49 6.0 3.3 52.3% 73.9% 53.6% 58.4% 43.5% 64.0% 36.9% 2018 47/47 6.5 3.3 61.7% 73.6% 53.2% 56.0% 38.6% 65.7% 34.5%
32 2017 34/34 7.6 3.5 52.0% 76.6% 49.9% 62.7% 39.9% 64.1% 36.3% 2019 34/34 7.9 5.0 58.3% 74.7% 53.5% 59.2% 33.6% 65.9% 34.1%
33 2018 28/29 9.6 3.5 56.0% 74.9% 50.9% 56.9% 37.7% 64.0% 38.1% 2020 7/7 5.3 6.3 58.0% 69.3% 51.3% 60.1% 27.6% 61.8% 26.9%
34 2019 7/7 5.7 4.1 55.2% 77.5% 46.0% 56.1% 43.2% 63.4% 37.0% 2021 1/1 0.0 6.0 50.8% 76.7% 37.9% 50.0% — 57.6% 24.5%
Career — 594/601 7.3 3.3 53.0% 75.0% 51.8% 57.6% 43.6% 64.1% 37.7% — 358/360 6.3 3.6 60.8% 73.0% 52.6% 58.3% 39.1% 65.1% 34.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marcos Baghdatis Leonardo Mayer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2003 1485 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1576 118.7 -0.69 +1.61 0.871 47.4% +16 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 2–0 — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1700 138.3 +1.75 +0.83 1.048 50.7% +36 — — 49.3% +0.13 4–5 (44%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.74 2007 1495 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 1843 151.4 +0.96 +3.30 1.081 51.5% +9 -291 -70 59.3% +0.45 11–9 (55%) 17–7 (71%) — -1.44 2008 1476 101.9 -0.40 -0.71 1.172 51.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–0 — +0.01
22 2007 1938 150.2 +2.29 +2.86 1.121 52.1% -36 -250 -59 61.7% +0.72 13–6 (68%) 18–16 (53%) — -0.34 2009 1665 131.8 +2.06 +0.49 1.120 51.6% -73 -41 -95 54.7% +0.43 1–8 (11%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.83
23 2008 1814 141.8 +1.75 -0.01 1.045 50.5% +1 — +137 56.3% +0.06 2–5 (29%) 7–3 (70%) — -0.74 2010 1652 134.7 +1.36 -2.46 0.928 48.7% -71 +91 — 42.3% -0.38 4–5 (44%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.68
24 2009 1785 147.9 +0.73 +2.59 1.086 51.4% +42 — +151 56.4% +0.42 1–6 (14%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.90 2011 1677 124.2 +0.17 -2.16 0.894 47.8% — +150 — 40.0% -0.87 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.29
25 2010 1852 156.2 +1.70 +2.21 1.087 51.3% +40 -122 -46 59.2% +0.51 12–11 (52%) 16–8 (67%) — -0.06 2012 1726 138.2 +1.16 -3.47 0.882 48.0% -95 +90 -215 42.9% -0.59 2–3 (40%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.21
26 2011 1844 157.1 +1.07 +0.51 1.016 50.4% +32 -159 +46 52.2% +0.26 8–11 (42%) 13–14 (48%) — -0.79 2013 1718 135.8 -0.98 -2.09 0.885 47.8% -75 +59 -185 44.4% -0.56 3–4 (43%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.11
27 2012 1908 155.9 +1.50 +1.16 1.059 50.9% +21 -225 +14 56.4% +0.32 9–6 (60%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.33 2014 1832 147.6 +2.77 -0.26 1.083 51.2% -185 +142 -147 55.0% +0.19 8–9 (47%) 16–9 (64%) — +0.33
28 2013 1806 154.0 +1.07 -0.98 0.959 49.3% +63 -182 +5 43.6% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.69 2015 1839 152.1 +2.61 -0.22 1.077 51.2% -111 +71 -78 53.4% +0.27 5–9 (36%) 16–12 (57%) — +1.37
29 2014 1705 123.0 -0.60 -0.13 0.951 48.8% +34 — +84 46.8% -0.34 4–6 (40%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.23 2016 1729 141.4 -0.34 -0.34 0.955 49.2% -17 +71 — 40.7% -0.34 2–3 (40%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.17
30 2015 1870 152.8 -0.76 +2.30 1.033 50.6% -3 -251 -6 56.9% +0.42 10–7 (59%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.74 2017 1797 137.1 -0.74 -0.87 0.928 48.2% -65 +75 — 57.4% +0.23 5–2 (71%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.32
31 2016 1884 158.0 +0.22 +1.50 1.027 50.2% +24 -227 -33 52.5% +0.08 6–7 (46%) 12–10 (55%) — -2.18 2018 1747 152.6 +2.05 -1.29 1.007 50.3% -45 +120 -84 50.4% +0.08 8–13 (38%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.16
32 2017 1839 144.1 +0.48 -0.05 1.011 50.1% +31 -215 -34 52.1% +0.15 6–1 (86%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.55 2019 1710 139.9 +1.41 -1.47 1.000 50.0% -11 +88 — 50.0% -0.13 5–9 (36%) 17–9 (65%) — +0.77
33 2018 1728 136.9 +0.05 +0.78 1.058 50.5% +55 -175 +46 43.8% -0.13 3–4 (43%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.39 2020 1606 116.6 -1.03 -3.14 0.703 45.4% +35 +97 — 23.8% -1.52 0–4 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.19
34 2019 1743 122.7 -0.99 +0.40 1.010 49.8% +39 — — 50.0% -0.11 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.56 2021 1520 93.3 -3.18 -4.11 0.578 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.27
Career — 1953 157.5 +0.97 +1.47 1.049 50.7% +23 -204 +4 54.6% +0.27 95–94 (50%) 147–125 (54%) 100.7 -1.90 — 1939 146.2 +1.33 -1.16 0.989 49.8% -75 +92 -125 48.7% -0.10 44–71 (38%) 106–92 (54%) 97.3 +0.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.