H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcos Baghdatis vs Matthias Bachinger H2H: 4-0
Marcos Baghdatis holds a 4–0 lead over Matthias Bachinger in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marcos Baghdatis leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2012 US Open first round 6-2 4-6 6-4 6-7(8) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CYP
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Marcos Baghdatis | 6-2 4-6 6-4 6-7(8) 7-6(5) | Matthias Bachinger | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2012* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Marcos Baghdatis | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Matthias Bachinger | Match data |
| Sep 22, 2011* | Metz | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Marcos Baghdatis | 7-5 6-2 | Matthias Bachinger | Match data |
| May 4, 2007* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Marcos Baghdatis | 6-7(7) 6-2 6-4 | Matthias Bachinger | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcos Baghdatis | #179 | #8 | 2,111 | 1,952 | 324 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Matthias Bachinger | #1,763 | #85 | 625 | 1,770 | 31 | 55 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcos Baghdatis | Matthias Bachinger | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #98 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #187 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #42 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #94 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #123 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #44 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,897 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #141 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #87 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #85 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #46 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,884 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #130 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2017 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #223 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2018 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #124 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #179 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |