H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Marcos Baghdatis vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 2-3

Radek Stepanek holds a 3–2 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Radek Stepanek leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2017 Qatar Open first round 6-4 5-3 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marcos Baghdatis
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Radek Stepanek #107 6-4 5-3 (ret.) Marcos Baghdatis #36 Match data Jan 4, 2017* R32 Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard
Radek Stepanek #70 3-6 6-1 7-6(7) Marcos Baghdatis #26 Match data Apr 12, 2011* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Marcos Baghdatis #18 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 Radek Stepanek #29 Match data May 10, 2007* R32 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Radek Stepanek #16 6-3 3-1 (ret.) Marcos Baghdatis #19 Match data May 17, 2006* R64 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
Marcos Baghdatis #54 6-4 6-3 3-6 0-6 7-5 Radek Stepanek #20 Match data Jan 20, 2006* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 327 274 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,037 366 285 56.2% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcos Baghdatis Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2004 2–2 50.0% #159 1,576 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,699 0 0 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,938 0 2 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,814 0 2 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,784 0 3 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,851 0 4 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,841 0 0
27 2012 33–25 56.9% #36 1,908 0 4 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,806 0 4 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,853 0 2
29 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,704 0 4 2008 31–24 56.4% #27 1,836 0 2
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,870 0 4 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,012 0 4
31 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,863 0 4
32 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,881 0 5
33 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,728 0 4 2012 21–20 51.2% #31 1,922 0 5
34 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,743 0 4 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,827 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,767 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,877 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,908 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marcos Baghdatis Radek Stepanek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2005 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 22 12 34 64.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 23 15 38 60.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2009 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2003 11 11 22 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2010 33 18 51 64.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2004 4 8 12 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 2011 18 18 36 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2005 18 15 33 54.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 11 3 14 78.6%
27 2012 24 16 40 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2006 13 7 20 65.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2013 14 15 29 48.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2007 20 12 32 62.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2008 21 17 38 55.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2015 17 13 30 56.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2009 34 13 47 72.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
31 2016 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2010 17 15 32 53.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 14 10 24 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 20 15 35 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
33 2018 11 11 22 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
34 2019 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 9 8 17 52.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 7 10 17 41.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 233 182 415 56.1% 30 50 80 37.5% 55 40 95 57.9% 9 2 11 81.8% — 209 169 378 55.3% 91 71 162 56.2% 43 30 73 58.9% 23 15 38 60.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 594/601 of Marcos Baghdatis's and 639/651 of Radek Stepanek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marcos Baghdatis Radek Stepanek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2004 2/4 11.5 7.5 51.4% 71.0% 41.1% 18.3% 61.4% 56.3% 38.1% 1998 1/1 5.0 1.0 54.7% 62.1% 33.3% 42.9% 20.0% 49.1% 30.8%
20 2005 23/23 7.5 2.6 56.7% 73.2% 52.6% 55.8% 51.8% 64.3% 37.5% 1999 6/6 6.0 2.0 58.3% 69.3% 42.6% 59.9% 38.6% 58.3% 38.4%
21 2006 53/53 7.4 3.3 52.5% 74.5% 50.5% 54.0% 44.4% 62.8% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 66/66 6.8 2.7 52.6% 75.1% 54.2% 61.3% 46.5% 65.0% 39.2% 2001 1/1 5.0 3.0 65.2% 68.9% 33.3% 70.0% 20.0% 56.5% 28.3%
23 2008 24/24 8.2 3.8 54.0% 77.5% 53.3% 57.0% 35.8% 66.3% 35.2% 2002 26/31 7.3 3.2 59.4% 72.9% 49.2% 60.7% 44.8% 63.2% 35.2%
24 2009 33/34 7.2 3.0 52.8% 75.2% 51.2% 56.2% 43.9% 63.7% 39.4% 2003 46/46 7.4 3.1 60.7% 72.8% 50.1% 55.3% 41.9% 63.5% 37.3%
25 2010 68/68 7.3 2.9 51.3% 75.9% 52.1% 57.6% 43.5% 64.5% 38.6% 2004 51/51 6.4 3.6 62.2% 72.6% 49.8% 55.7% 43.6% 64.0% 36.2%
26 2011 53/53 7.5 2.9 51.3% 76.4% 51.0% 59.2% 46.0% 63.9% 36.7% 2005 71/71 7.5 3.0 64.4% 73.7% 51.7% 66.5% 39.3% 65.9% 37.1%
27 2012 55/58 6.3 3.1 54.7% 73.6% 52.4% 54.6% 43.1% 64.2% 37.9% 2006 45/45 8.7 3.2 63.9% 74.4% 54.9% 62.6% 43.0% 67.3% 38.3%
28 2013 36/36 7.6 4.3 53.0% 75.3% 51.9% 64.0% 39.1% 64.1% 34.4% 2007 47/48 7.0 2.0 62.1% 75.9% 56.8% 64.8% 46.2% 68.7% 37.6%
29 2014 18/18 6.4 4.6 52.0% 74.5% 50.3% 45.3% 45.3% 63.0% 35.2% 2008 53/55 7.3 3.2 63.6% 76.1% 52.4% 64.1% 47.8% 67.4% 36.7%
30 2015 45/45 7.8 3.6 54.5% 74.1% 51.1% 58.0% 45.4% 63.6% 37.6% 2009 63/63 6.3 3.2 61.4% 73.3% 50.5% 57.0% 41.7% 64.4% 39.9%
31 2016 49/49 6.0 3.3 52.3% 73.9% 53.6% 58.4% 43.5% 64.0% 36.9% 2010 31/32 5.0 3.0 64.0% 70.1% 51.8% 59.2% 38.2% 64.0% 37.0%
32 2017 34/34 7.6 3.5 52.0% 76.6% 49.9% 62.7% 39.9% 64.1% 36.3% 2011 54/54 3.6 2.8 60.8% 70.7% 51.7% 58.1% 41.9% 63.3% 38.6%
33 2018 28/29 9.6 3.5 56.0% 74.9% 50.9% 56.9% 37.7% 64.0% 38.1% 2012 40/41 4.8 3.1 61.6% 71.5% 53.7% 63.1% 39.4% 64.5% 39.4%
34 2019 7/7 5.7 4.1 55.2% 77.5% 46.0% 56.1% 43.2% 63.4% 37.0% 2013 29/30 4.7 2.9 63.5% 69.3% 49.0% 55.4% 45.7% 61.9% 39.3%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 33/33 5.8 3.4 60.3% 72.8% 51.4% 60.2% 37.4% 64.5% 38.0%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 17/17 4.6 3.6 62.7% 71.8% 50.4% 64.2% 50.0% 63.8% 37.9%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 20/21 6.0 3.9 59.5% 72.2% 49.9% 60.8% 40.2% 63.4% 37.9%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 5/5 4.4 5.4 54.7% 70.3% 43.6% 69.0% 34.3% 58.4% 40.3%
Career — 594/601 7.3 3.3 53.0% 75.0% 51.8% 57.6% 43.6% 64.1% 37.7% — 639/651 6.3 3.1 62.1% 72.9% 51.6% 60.6% 42.3% 64.8% 37.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marcos Baghdatis Radek Stepanek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2003 1485 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1576 118.7 -0.69 +1.61 0.871 47.4% +16 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 2–0 — -0.09 1998 1489 99.4 -0.50 -3.84 0.604 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06
20 2005 1700 138.3 +1.75 +0.83 1.048 50.7% +36 — — 49.3% +0.13 4–5 (44%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.74 1999 1502 117.9 +0.16 -0.75 0.920 48.5% +39 +31 — 35.7% -0.64 1–1 0–2 — -0.17
21 2006 1843 151.4 +0.96 +3.30 1.081 51.5% +9 -291 -70 59.3% +0.45 11–9 (55%) 17–7 (71%) — -1.44 2000 1493 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 1938 150.2 +2.29 +2.86 1.121 52.1% -36 -250 -59 61.7% +0.72 13–6 (68%) 18–16 (53%) — -0.34 2001 1464 98.0 -2.55 -0.96 0.652 43.4% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.07
23 2008 1814 141.8 +1.75 -0.01 1.045 50.5% +1 — +137 56.3% +0.06 2–5 (29%) 7–3 (70%) — -0.74 2002 1659 130.9 +1.72 -2.01 0.956 49.4% -95 -3 -24 53.9% +0.12 4–4 (50%) 10–4 (71%) — +0.45
24 2009 1785 147.9 +0.73 +2.59 1.086 51.4% +42 — +151 56.4% +0.42 1–6 (14%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.90 2003 1716 137.5 +1.55 +0.11 1.021 49.7% -50 -11 +20 53.4% +0.15 7–8 (47%) 7–11 (39%) — -0.79
25 2010 1852 156.2 +1.70 +2.21 1.087 51.3% +40 -122 -46 59.2% +0.51 12–11 (52%) 16–8 (67%) — -0.06 2004 1790 136.2 +1.09 -0.10 1.005 50.1% -38 -63 -52 51.9% +0.08 12–7 (63%) 13–12 (52%) — -2.23
26 2011 1844 157.1 +1.07 +0.51 1.016 50.4% +32 -159 +46 52.2% +0.26 8–11 (42%) 13–14 (48%) — -0.79 2005 1841 145.4 +2.95 +0.75 1.088 51.5% 0 -67 -37 57.7% +0.53 20–11 (65%) 19–16 (54%) — +2.05
27 2012 1908 155.9 +1.50 +1.16 1.059 50.9% +21 -225 +14 56.4% +0.32 9–6 (60%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.33 2006 1866 141.5 +4.32 +1.02 1.172 52.4% -33 -19 +10 62.2% +0.76 8–6 (57%) 13–11 (54%) — +2.10
28 2013 1806 154.0 +1.07 -0.98 0.959 49.3% +63 -182 +5 43.6% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.69 2007 1854 148.1 +4.89 +1.48 1.201 52.8% +27 -67 -43 52.2% +0.39 7–9 (44%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.67
29 2014 1705 123.0 -0.60 -0.13 0.951 48.8% +34 — +84 46.8% -0.34 4–6 (40%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.23 2008 1837 157.2 +3.56 +1.09 1.126 51.6% -30 +96 +2 58.7% +0.80 10–12 (45%) 15–16 (48%) — +0.45
30 2015 1870 152.8 -0.76 +2.30 1.033 50.6% -3 -251 -6 56.9% +0.42 10–7 (59%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.74 2009 2013 160.7 +1.73 +3.84 1.123 51.8% +19 -107 -91 61.9% +0.57 17–6 (74%) 12–3 (80%) — +1.40
31 2016 1884 158.0 +0.22 +1.50 1.027 50.2% +24 -227 -33 52.5% +0.08 6–7 (46%) 12–10 (55%) — -2.18 2010 1864 146.3 +0.65 +0.89 1.026 50.5% -3 — — 47.9% +0.11 5–2 (71%) 8–6 (57%) — +0.90
32 2017 1839 144.1 +0.48 -0.05 1.011 50.1% +31 -215 -34 52.1% +0.15 6–1 (86%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.55 2011 1881 156.8 +0.65 +2.39 1.052 50.8% +8 -12 +29 55.6% +0.40 9–6 (60%) 7–8 (47%) — -2.99
33 2018 1728 136.9 +0.05 +0.78 1.058 50.5% +55 -175 +46 43.8% -0.13 3–4 (43%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.39 2012 1923 159.1 +1.92 +3.04 1.109 51.8% +7 -124 +4 51.5% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 11–8 (58%) — -1.03
34 2019 1743 122.7 -0.99 +0.40 1.010 49.8% +39 — — 50.0% -0.11 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.56 2013 1828 147.9 -0.61 +2.71 1.032 50.4% +61 -128 +76 48.6% +0.17 4–3 (57%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.65
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1802 154.6 +0.71 +2.99 1.070 51.0% -25 -46 +189 50.6% +0.23 6–8 (43%) 8–7 (53%) — -1.38
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1767 133.6 -0.58 +2.17 1.047 50.8% -15 +42 — 43.6% -0.20 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.28
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1877 143.0 +0.67 +1.85 1.035 50.5% -41 -15 +22 48.1% +0.02 3–3 (50%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.65
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1908 130.4 -0.95 +0.89 0.968 49.7% -21 — — 50.0% -0.20 — 1–0 — -0.50
Career — 1953 157.5 +0.97 +1.47 1.049 50.7% +23 -204 +4 54.6% +0.27 95–94 (50%) 147–125 (54%) 100.7 -1.90 — 2038 154.7 +1.94 +1.47 1.073 51.1% -9 -39 +15 54.4% +0.34 120–97 (55%) 139–135 (51%) 103.0 -0.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.