H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Marcos Baghdatis vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 1-1
Marcos Baghdatis and Sergiy Stakhovsky are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2012 Tokyo third round 7-6(3) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CYP
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2012* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Marcos Baghdatis | 7-6(3) 7-5 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Aug 27, 2010* | New Haven | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 5-7 6-1 7-6(4) | Marcos Baghdatis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcos Baghdatis | #179 | #8 | 2,111 | 1,952 | 324 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marcos Baghdatis | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #98 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #42 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2010 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #44 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,897 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #87 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #85 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #46 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,884 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #124 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #179 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |