H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Marcos Baghdatis vs Steve Darcis H2H: 3-2

Marcos Baghdatis holds a 3–2 lead over Steve Darcis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Steve Darcis won the 2015 US Open first round 6-7(2) 6-3 6-2 3-1 RET.

CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
BEL Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 2, 2015* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Steve Darcis #66 6-7(2) 6-3 6-2 3-1 (ret.) Marcos Baghdatis #51 Match data
Apr 23, 2015* Bucharest ATP 250 R32 Clay Marcos Baghdatis #59 6-4 6-2 Steve Darcis #74 Match data
Jun 21, 2012* Eastbourne ATP 250 R16 Grass Steve Darcis #72 6-4 4-6 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #42 Match data
Aug 25, 2011* Winston-Salem ATP 250 R16 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #60 7-5 6-0 Steve Darcis #102 Match data
Jun 25, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Marcos Baghdatis #25 6-3 6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 Steve Darcis #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Steve Darcis #756 #38 1,362 1,832 92 122 43.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcos Baghdatis Steve Darcis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2 2006 0–1 0.0% #483 1,472 0 0
23 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2 2007 6–2 75.0% #86 1,667 0 1
24 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3 2008 20–19 51.3% #61 1,772 0 2
25 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4 2009 5–18 21.7% #122 1,564 0 2
26 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4 2010 4–6 40.0% #109 1,685 0 2
27 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4 2011 7–6 53.8% #88 1,796 0 2
28 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4 2012 17–17 50.0% #93 1,756 0 2
29 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4 2013 2–7 22.2% #164 1,678 0 2
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4 2014 0–1 0.0% #160 1,676 0 2
31 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4 2015 8–11 42.1% #86 1,729 0 2
32 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4 2016 3–5 37.5% #86 1,761 0 2
33 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4 2017 16–18 47.1% #77 1,799 0 2
34 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4
35 2019 4–11 26.7% #157 1,664 0 2