H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcos Baghdatis vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 2-1
Marcos Baghdatis holds a 2–1 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Vincent Spadea leads 1–0 on clay, while Marcos Baghdatis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2008 Las Vegas third round 7-6(5) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CYP
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2008* | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Marcos Baghdatis | 7-6(5) 6-1 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2006* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Marcos Baghdatis | 6-2 7-6(5) | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2006* | Houston | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Vincent Spadea | 6-2 3-1 (ret.) | Marcos Baghdatis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcos Baghdatis | #179 | #8 | 2,111 | 1,952 | 324 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marcos Baghdatis | Vincent Spadea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #98 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #42 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #44 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,897 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #87 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #85 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #46 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,884 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #124 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #179 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |