H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marcos Giron vs Roberto Carballes Baena H2H: 1-1
Marcos Giron and Roberto Carballes Baena are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marcos Giron leads 1–0 on clay, while Roberto Carballes Baena leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcos Giron won the 2023 Munich third round 6-1 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 32
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Spain
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2023* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marcos Giron | 6-1 5-7 6-2 | Roberto Carballes Baena | Match data |
| Nov 2, 2020 | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Marcos Giron | 6-4 6-1 | Roberto Carballes Baena | Match data |
| Aug 20, 2019* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Roberto Carballes Baena | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | Marcos Giron | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcos Giron | #87 | #37 | 1,265 | 1,916 | 137 | 160 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Roberto Carballes Baena | #165 | #49 | 1,071 | 1,798 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcos Giron | Roberto Carballes Baena | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #375 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #131 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #308 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #106 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #73 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #80 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2021 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #66 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2022 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #61 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #79 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2023 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #60 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2025 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #65 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #57 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2026 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #87 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #129 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |