H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Marcos Ondruska vs Leonardo Lavalle H2H: 0-1
Leonardo Lavalle holds a 1–0 lead over Marcos Ondruska in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leonardo Lavalle leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leonardo Lavalle won the 1992 Johannesburg third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 53
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 59
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 1992* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Leonardo Lavalle | 6-4 6-2 | Marcos Ondruska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcos Ondruska | #1,352 | #27 | 1,007 | 1,785 | 105 | 137 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Leonardo Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcos Ondruska | Leonardo Lavalle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #256 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #137 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #67 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #47 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #64 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #98 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #114 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #102 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #99 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #263 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |