H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcos Ondruska vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 2-1
Marcos Ondruska holds a 2–1 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marcos Ondruska leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Mark Woodforde leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1998 Singapore third round 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 53
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 1998* | Singapore | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mark Woodforde | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Marcos Ondruska | Match data |
| Mar 18, 1993* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Marcos Ondruska | 6-4 6-2 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1991* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marcos Ondruska | 6-3 6-3 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcos Ondruska | #1,352 | #27 | 1,007 | 1,785 | 105 | 137 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcos Ondruska | Mark Woodforde | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #256 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #137 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #67 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #47 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1994 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #98 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1995 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #114 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1996 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #102 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1998 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #263 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 |