H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Mardy Fish vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 3-1

Mardy Fish holds a 3–1 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mardy Fish leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Fernando Verdasco leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mardy Fish won the 2010 Cincinnati Masters third round 7-6(1) 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mardy Fish
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 18, 2010* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Mardy Fish #36 7-6(1) 7-6(4) Fernando Verdasco #8 Match data
Apr 30, 2009* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Fernando Verdasco #8 6-4 5-7 6-3 Mardy Fish #28 Match data
Aug 22, 2008* New Haven ATP 250 SF Hard Mardy Fish #35 6-0 1-6 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #13 Match data
Jun 12, 2004* Halle ATP 250 QF Grass Mardy Fish #23 6-2 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #50 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,114 290 211 57.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mardy Fish Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2004 21–17 55.3% #37 1,728 0 1 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,625 0 1 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,729 0 2 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,756 0 2 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,854 0 2 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,789 0 3 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,009 0 5 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,008 0 6 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,932 0 6 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,882 0 6 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 — — — — — — — 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7