H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mardy Fish vs George Bastl H2H: 0-1
George Bastl holds a 1–0 lead over Mardy Fish in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, George Bastl leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, George Bastl won the 2005 Indianapolis fourth round 1-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 44
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 51
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2005 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | George Bastl | 1-2 (ret.) | Mardy Fish | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mardy Fish | #619 | #7 | 3,060 | 2,114 | 290 | 211 | 57.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| George Bastl | #953 | #71 | 569 | 1,657 | 47 | 85 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mardy Fish | George Bastl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #305 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #141 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #225 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #194 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #47 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #81 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #105 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #55 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #16 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #8 | 2,012 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #27 | 2,008 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #373 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #173 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #423 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #233 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |