H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Mardy Fish vs Gilles Muller H2H: 2-1

Mardy Fish holds a 2–1 lead over Gilles Muller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mardy Fish leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilles Muller won the 2012 Atlanta fourth round 4-6 2-3 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mardy Fish
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Gilles Muller
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 20, 2012* Atlanta ATP 250 R16 Hard Gilles Muller #63 4-6 2-3 (ret.) Mardy Fish #13 Match data
Jan 18, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Mardy Fish #8 6-4 6-4 6-2 Gilles Muller #55 Match data
Jul 29, 2011* Los Angeles ATP 250 R16 Hard Mardy Fish #9 7-6(1) 6-1 Gilles Muller #71 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,114 290 211 57.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,071 200 199 50.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mardy Fish Gilles Muller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0
20 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0
21 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,599 0 0
22 2004 21–17 55.3% #37 1,728 0 1 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,727 0 0
23 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,625 0 1 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,535 0 0
24 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,729 0 2 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,578 0 0
25 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,756 0 2 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,675 0 0
26 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,854 0 2 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,634 0 0
27 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,789 0 3 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,612 0 0
28 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,009 0 5 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0
29 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6 2012 20–20 50.0% #67 1,834 0 0
30 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,008 0 6 2013 2–7 22.2% #368 1,691 0 0
31 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,932 0 6 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,743 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,893 0 0
33 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,882 0 6 2016 33–23 58.9% #34 1,956 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,939 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,687 0 2