H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mardy Fish vs Igor Andreev H2H: 2-0
Mardy Fish holds a 2–0 lead over Igor Andreev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mardy Fish leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mardy Fish won the 2009 Rome Masters second round 6-3 4-6 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 44
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2009* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Mardy Fish | 6-3 4-6 7-6(2) | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| Mar 16, 2008* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mardy Fish | 6-4 6-3 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mardy Fish | #619 | #7 | 3,060 | 2,114 | 290 | 211 | 57.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mardy Fish | Igor Andreev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #305 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #141 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2004 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2005 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #225 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2006 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #47 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2008 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2009 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #55 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2010 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #16 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2011 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #8 | 2,012 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2012 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #27 | 2,008 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #373 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #423 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |