H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mardy Fish vs Joachim Johansson H2H: 2-2
Mardy Fish and Joachim Johansson are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mardy Fish leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Joachim Johansson leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Joachim Johansson won the 2004 Wimbledon second round 6-7(8) 6-3 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 44
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 44
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2004* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Joachim Johansson | 6-7(8) 6-3 6-4 6-4 | Mardy Fish | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2004* | Memphis | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Joachim Johansson | 6-2 6-4 | Mardy Fish | Match data |
| Aug 27, 2003* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mardy Fish | 6-3 6-2 6-4 | Joachim Johansson | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2003* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mardy Fish | 6-3 7-5 6-2 | Joachim Johansson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mardy Fish | #619 | #7 | 3,060 | 2,114 | 290 | 211 | 57.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Joachim Johansson | #705 | #9 | 1,980 | 1,942 | 69 | 53 | 56.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mardy Fish | Joachim Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #773 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #305 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #390 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #141 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #11 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2004 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2005 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #225 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #193 | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2006 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #47 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #350 | 1,736 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #771 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2008 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #365 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2009 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #55 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #16 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #8 | 2,012 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #27 | 2,008 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #694 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #373 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #423 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |