H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mardy Fish vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 2-1
Mardy Fish holds a 2–1 lead over Juan Ignacio Chela in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mardy Fish leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mardy Fish won the 2007 Auckland quarterfinal 7-6(3) 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 44
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2007* | Auckland | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Mardy Fish | 7-6(3) 7-6(8) | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
| Aug 24, 2002* | Long Island | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Juan Ignacio Chela | 7-5 6-3 | Mardy Fish | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2001* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mardy Fish | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mardy Fish | #619 | #7 | 3,060 | 2,114 | 290 | 211 | 57.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mardy Fish | Juan Ignacio Chela | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #305 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #141 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2004 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2005 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #225 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2006 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #47 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2008 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2009 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #55 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2010 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #16 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2011 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #8 | 2,012 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2012 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #27 | 2,008 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #373 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #423 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |