H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mardy Fish vs Juan Monaco H2H: 3-2

Mardy Fish holds a 3–2 lead over Juan Monaco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Mardy Fish leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mardy Fish won the 2012 Canada Masters fourth round 2-6 6-1 6-4.

USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
ARG Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 10, 2012* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Mardy Fish #13 2-6 6-1 6-4 Juan Monaco #10 Match data
Mar 30, 2012* Miami Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Juan Monaco #21 6-1 6-3 Mardy Fish #8 Match data
Nov 11, 2011* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Juan Monaco #34 1-6 7-6(6) 1-2 (ret.) Mardy Fish #9 Match data
Apr 13, 2006* Houston ATP 250 R32 Clay Mardy Fish #212 6-2 1-6 7-6(5) Juan Monaco #91 Match data
Jan 19, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Mardy Fish #37 2-6 6-0 6-4 4-6 9-7 Juan Monaco #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,114 290 211 57.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Juan Monaco #226 #10 2,775 2,046 319 256 55.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mardy Fish Juan Monaco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0
19 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0
20 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0 2004 16–12 57.1% #73 1,661 0 0
21 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1 2005 18–25 41.9% #85 1,587 0 0
22 2004 21–17 55.3% #37 1,728 0 1 2006 18–23 43.9% #69 1,641 0 0
23 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,625 0 1 2007 41–19 68.3% #23 1,864 0 3
24 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,729 0 2 2008 27–20 57.4% #46 1,768 0 3
25 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,756 0 2 2009 34–24 58.6% #30 1,850 0 3
26 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,854 0 2 2010 28–18 60.9% #26 1,838 0 3
27 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,789 0 3 2011 26–24 52.0% #26 1,932 0 3
28 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,009 0 5 2012 36–17 67.9% #12 1,944 0 7
29 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6 2013 18–21 46.2% #42 1,809 0 7
30 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,008 0 6 2014 20–18 52.6% #62 1,856 0 7
31 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,932 0 6 2015 21–19 52.5% #53 1,811 0 7
32 2016 16–13 55.2% #65 1,864 0 8
33 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,882 0 6 2017 0–3 0.0% #226 1,805 0 8