H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mardy Fish vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 2-2

Mardy Fish and Lleyton Hewitt are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mardy Fish leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mardy Fish won the 2009 San Jose third round 7-6(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mardy Fish
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 12, 2009* San Jose ATP 250 R32 Hard Mardy Fish #24 7-6(5) 6-3 Lleyton Hewitt #107 Match data
May 29, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #28 6-4 6-3 6-2 Mardy Fish #39 Match data
Mar 20, 2008* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Mardy Fish #98 7-5 3-6 7-6(4) Lleyton Hewitt #24 Match data
Jun 13, 2002* Queen's Club ATP 250 R32 Grass Lleyton Hewitt #1 7-5 6-3 Mardy Fish #148 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,114 290 211 57.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mardy Fish Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 2004 21–17 55.3% #37 1,728 0 1 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,625 0 1 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,729 0 2 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,756 0 2 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,854 0 2 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,789 0 3 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,009 0 5 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,008 0 6 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,932 0 6 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 — — — — — — — 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,882 0 6 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 — — — — — — — 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 — — — — — — — 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30