H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Mardy Fish vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 0-3

Marcos Baghdatis holds a 3–0 lead over Mardy Fish in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marcos Baghdatis leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2010 Sydney semifinal 6-4 6-7(7) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mardy Fish
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Marcos Baghdatis
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 16, 2010* Sydney ATP 250 SF Hard Marcos Baghdatis #42 6-4 6-7(7) 7-6(5) Mardy Fish #55 Match data
Jan 6, 2010* Brisbane ATP 250 R32 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #42 7-5 7-5 Mardy Fish #55 Match data
Jan 25, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #97 6-2 6-4 6-4 Mardy Fish #24 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,114 290 211 57.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mardy Fish Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2004 21–17 55.3% #37 1,728 0 1 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,625 0 1 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,729 0 2 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,756 0 2 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,854 0 2 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,789 0 3 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,009 0 5 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,008 0 6 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,932 0 6 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,882 0 6 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4