H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mardy Fish vs Michael Berrer H2H: 2-1

Mardy Fish holds a 2–1 lead over Michael Berrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mardy Fish leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mardy Fish won the 2010 Roland Garros first round 5-7 6-4 3-6 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mardy Fish
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Michael Berrer
GER Age 46 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 26, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Mardy Fish #97 5-7 6-4 3-6 6-1 6-3 Michael Berrer #42 Match data
Mar 13, 2010* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Mardy Fish #106 1-6 6-1 6-3 Michael Berrer #51 Match data
Aug 1, 2007* Washington ATP 500 R32 Hard Michael Berrer #84 7-6(4) 6-4 Mardy Fish #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,114 290 211 57.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Michael Berrer #952 #42 960 1,783 88 143 38.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mardy Fish Michael Berrer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2004 21–17 55.3% #37 1,728 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,625 0 1 2004 0–1 0.0% #235 1,498 0 0
24 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,729 0 2 2005 1–2 33.3% #126 1,526 0 0
25 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,756 0 2 2006 4–11 26.7% #152 1,513 0 0
26 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,854 0 2 2007 13–12 52.0% #57 1,671 0 0
27 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,789 0 3 2008 8–20 28.6% #131 1,545 0 0
28 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,009 0 5 2009 5–8 38.5% #74 1,629 0 0
29 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6 2010 20–28 41.7% #58 1,682 0 0
30 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,008 0 6 2011 17–22 43.6% #100 1,701 0 0
31 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,932 0 6 2012 5–11 31.2% #138 1,702 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2013 2–3 40.0% #143 1,618 0 0
33 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,882 0 6 2014 3–6 33.3% #128 1,575 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2015 6–10 37.5% #115 1,682 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2016 4–9 30.8% #182 1,630 0 0