H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Mardy Fish vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 3-0

Mardy Fish holds a 3–0 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mardy Fish leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mardy Fish won the 2012 Miami Masters fourth round 6-3 6-7(2) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mardy Fish
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 28, 2012* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Mardy Fish #8 6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 Nicolas Almagro #12 Match data
Oct 25, 2007* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Mardy Fish #43 2-6 6-3 7-6(4) Nicolas Almagro #26 Match data
Oct 10, 2007* Vienna ATP 500 R32 Hard Mardy Fish #39 6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,114 290 211 57.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mardy Fish Nicolas Almagro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 2004 21–17 55.3% #37 1,728 0 1 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4
23 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,625 0 1 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5
24 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,729 0 2 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7
25 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,756 0 2 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10
26 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,854 0 2 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12
27 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,789 0 3 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12
28 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,009 0 5 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12
29 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,008 0 6 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13
31 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,932 0 6 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13
32 — — — — — — — 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13
33 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,882 0 6 — — — — — — —