H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Mardy Fish vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 0-2

Nicolas Kiefer holds a 2–0 lead over Mardy Fish in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Kiefer leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2008 Canada Masters second round 7-5 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mardy Fish
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 23, 2008* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #37 7-5 7-6(4) Mardy Fish #41 Match data
Mar 15, 2001* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #43 6-4 6-1 Mardy Fish #206 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,114 290 211 57.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mardy Fish Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 2004 21–17 55.3% #37 1,728 0 1 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,625 0 1 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,729 0 2 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,756 0 2 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,854 0 2 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,789 0 3 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,009 0 5 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,008 0 6 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,932 0 6 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6
33 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,882 0 6 — — — — — — —