H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Mardy Fish vs Nicolas Mahut H2H: 3-0

Mardy Fish holds a 3–0 lead over Nicolas Mahut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mardy Fish leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mardy Fish won the 2011 Atlanta round of 16 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mardy Fish
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Nicolas Mahut
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mardy Fish #9 6-3 6-3 Nicolas Mahut #97 Match data Jul 22, 2011* R16 Atlanta ATP 250 Hard
Mardy Fish #42 7-5 6-4 3-6 6-4 Nicolas Mahut #68 Match data Jan 18, 2007* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Mardy Fish #65 6-1 6-3 Nicolas Mahut #67 Match data Aug 16, 2006* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,116 295 212 58.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,930 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mardy Fish Nicolas Mahut
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,517 0 0
19 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,500 0 0
20 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,446 0 0
21 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,539 0 0
22 2004 26–18 59.1% #37 1,760 0 1 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0
23 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,640 0 1 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0
24 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,726 0 2 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0
25 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,755 0 2 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0
26 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,860 0 2 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,645 0 0
27 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,815 0 3 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,634 0 0
28 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,023 0 5 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,663 0 0
29 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,776 0 0
30 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,012 0 6 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,757 0 0
31 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,935 0 6 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,852 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,664 0 2
33 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,885 0 6 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,871 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,754 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,708 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mardy Fish Nicolas Mahut
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2001 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2002 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 29 12 41 70.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2004 19 13 32 59.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2004 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2006 12 14 26 46.2% 5 0 5 100.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2007 22 14 36 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2008 26 15 41 63.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2008 13 16 29 44.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2009 13 10 23 56.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
28 2010 25 11 36 69.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 2010 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2011 33 17 50 66.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
30 2012 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2012 10 14 24 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
31 2013 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
33 2015 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 12 11 23 52.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 221 151 372 59.4% 24 29 53 45.3% 46 26 72 63.9% 4 6 10 40.0% — 92 133 225 40.9% 17 39 56 30.4% 67 41 108 62.0% 3 11 14 21.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 452/465 of Mardy Fish's and 401/403 of Nicolas Mahut's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mardy Fish Nicolas Mahut
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 2/2 2.5 3.5 54.1% 65.6% 50.0% 54.2% 34.3% 58.4% 30.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 5/5 9.0 4.0 63.3% 71.4% 45.1% 59.0% 24.9% 61.6% 31.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 1/1 10.0 0.0 59.2% 69.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 65.3% 32.4%
21 2003 58/61 11.0 3.9 53.4% 80.0% 52.0% 64.2% 39.2% 67.0% 35.1% 2003 9/9 9.4 5.2 58.3% 71.9% 49.0% 55.7% 32.7% 62.4% 33.9%
22 2004 38/44 11.1 4.1 55.1% 77.2% 50.8% 65.1% 42.1% 65.4% 35.2% 2004 12/13 7.8 5.1 58.7% 68.5% 42.4% 46.6% 44.2% 57.7% 34.2%
23 2005 17/17 10.3 3.4 53.9% 72.8% 46.5% 53.7% 34.0% 60.9% 34.2% 2005 6/6 7.7 3.3 60.0% 77.5% 44.7% 36.9% 32.6% 64.2% 26.7%
24 2006 40/41 9.5 3.1 51.8% 78.8% 53.9% 68.1% 43.9% 66.5% 37.5% 2006 30/30 7.9 3.4 62.2% 70.5% 48.4% 56.4% 45.6% 62.2% 31.6%
25 2007 45/45 11.4 2.7 52.2% 80.1% 52.1% 55.7% 42.6% 66.5% 35.7% 2007 42/42 7.8 4.9 57.0% 75.5% 52.0% 61.9% 42.1% 65.2% 33.9%
26 2008 55/55 10.1 2.7 49.3% 77.9% 51.8% 57.6% 39.2% 64.6% 36.6% 2008 42/42 9.0 4.2 61.9% 72.6% 49.2% 63.1% 38.8% 63.7% 31.5%
27 2009 37/38 11.0 2.3 56.9% 77.1% 53.3% 58.2% 44.0% 66.6% 36.9% 2009 8/8 9.0 2.6 62.3% 80.1% 50.1% 63.2% 40.7% 68.9% 35.2%
28 2010 52/53 10.9 2.3 55.3% 79.7% 54.6% 62.1% 49.8% 68.5% 38.1% 2010 10/10 17.8 5.1 64.7% 76.0% 49.3% 66.9% 52.9% 66.5% 29.4%
29 2011 64/64 7.6 1.7 58.4% 76.7% 55.4% 64.9% 44.7% 67.7% 39.4% 2011 22/23 7.3 3.7 59.9% 74.6% 52.0% 61.9% 35.6% 65.3% 37.6%
30 2012 31/32 9.7 2.5 52.2% 77.9% 55.4% 68.6% 51.3% 67.1% 39.8% 2012 34/34 8.0 2.7 60.4% 72.3% 50.5% 64.5% 39.6% 63.8% 32.9%
31 2013 9/9 5.8 3.1 49.6% 75.7% 47.6% 45.0% 44.4% 61.2% 37.2% 2013 24/24 8.5 3.3 59.3% 79.5% 54.2% 71.3% 42.4% 69.1% 39.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 37/37 7.7 3.4 60.8% 72.2% 49.9% 55.5% 38.3% 63.6% 33.2%
33 2015 6/6 8.3 3.8 52.2% 75.4% 46.3% 54.9% 43.2% 61.5% 40.9% 2015 21/21 7.4 2.9 62.7% 72.3% 46.6% 58.6% 40.6% 63.0% 36.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 43/43 5.3 2.6 60.7% 74.0% 50.5% 58.7% 53.5% 64.9% 35.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 33/33 6.5 2.8 61.3% 70.8% 52.4% 60.0% 33.8% 63.7% 33.7%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 13/13 4.3 3.4 61.0% 72.2% 48.5% 54.4% 39.0% 62.9% 34.0%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 7/7 7.1 2.7 59.4% 72.5% 55.1% 71.2% 36.9% 65.8% 34.2%
Career — 452/507 10.0 2.8 53.9% 78.1% 52.8% 61.7% 43.4% 66.3% 37.1% — 401/403 7.7 3.5 60.6% 73.3% 50.1% 60.0% 41.0% 64.2% 33.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mardy Fish Nicolas Mahut
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1524 106.9 — — — — -10 — +79 35.3% -1.29 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.29 2000 1518 106.3 -0.24 -1.50 0.740 45.8% — — — 16.7% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.11
19 2001 1543 124.2 — — — — +34 — +26 37.8% -0.54 5–4 (56%) 0–4 (0%) — -0.58 2001 1500 110.5 -0.73 -2.42 0.806 46.0% +14 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.14
20 2002 1630 123.4 — — — — +7 — -44 47.4% -0.32 4–3 (57%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.37 2002 1447 95.7 -1.89 -0.35 0.934 45.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.22
21 2003 1841 146.3 +3.97 -0.87 1.064 50.8% +36 -346 -162 57.3% +0.28 15–8 (65%) 18–18 (50%) — -0.62 2003 1540 115.6 +0.41 -1.30 0.903 48.1% +28 — — 23.8% -1.38 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.20
22 2004 1761 139.2 +1.62 -0.32 1.019 50.7% +14 — -26 54.0% +0.36 12–5 (71%) 6–11 (35%) — +0.83 2004 1545 109.2 -3.28 -1.51 0.808 46.2% +20 -80 +2 29.4% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.16
23 2005 1641 122.4 -1.17 -0.67 0.875 47.6% +31 — — 34.9% -0.84 4–0 (100%) 2–7 (22%) — -0.38 2005 1468 108.5 -0.35 -3.57 0.745 46.3% +26 — — 28.6% -1.00 0–2 0–2 — +0.50
24 2006 1727 137.0 +3.82 +0.31 1.121 52.1% -53 -159 +51 54.8% +0.55 6–5 (55%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.33 2006 1582 128.9 +0.81 -3.33 0.835 47.0% -87 -146 +113 39.7% -0.46 3–1 (75%) 4–12 (25%) — -1.54
25 2007 1756 144.3 +2.76 +0.38 1.067 51.0% +30 -208 -75 50.5% +0.02 8–6 (57%) 11–13 (46%) — +0.23 2007 1733 136.0 +2.07 -1.43 0.975 49.5% -133 -232 +160 51.4% +0.10 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) — -1.38
26 2008 1861 148.1 +1.58 +0.64 1.033 50.7% +50 -274 -175 56.0% +0.36 10–6 (63%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.64 2008 1646 139.7 +0.72 -3.30 0.869 48.1% +10 -169 +149 38.0% -0.56 10–6 (63%) 7–18 (28%) — -1.66
27 2009 1816 145.3 +2.33 +0.49 1.105 51.8% +26 -197 -21 55.3% +0.47 5–8 (38%) 7–9 (44%) — -0.08 2009 1634 116.4 +1.22 +0.45 1.133 52.1% — — +194 52.6% +0.42 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.02
28 2010 2023 156.7 +4.21 +2.02 1.209 53.0% +22 -393 -76 67.2% +0.98 10–6 (63%) 20–5 (80%) — +0.51 2010 1663 119.6 +0.80 -3.07 0.879 48.7% -81 — +172 41.4% -0.41 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.59
29 2011 2012 168.6 +4.73 +3.34 1.217 53.5% +6 -303 +46 64.1% +0.86 10–8 (56%) 14–10 (58%) — +1.88 2011 1776 139.1 +1.77 +0.87 1.085 51.4% 0 — -11 51.9% +0.54 2–2 (50%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.18
30 2012 2013 152.5 +3.05 +2.62 1.209 53.3% +23 — +55 61.5% +0.88 5–2 (71%) 8–8 (50%) — +2.93 2012 1758 146.6 +0.71 -2.00 0.908 48.7% -26 -191 +12 47.3% -0.12 4–3 (57%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.76
31 2013 1936 131.0 -1.70 +0.61 0.959 49.0% +18 — — 45.0% -0.10 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.20 2013 1853 136.9 +4.19 +0.90 1.267 53.8% -98 — +138 67.3% +1.11 1–2 (33%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.94
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1665 136.4 -0.71 -2.67 0.911 48.4% -1 -159 +232 40.9% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.82
33 2015 1885 133.8 -0.64 +1.74 1.060 51.0% +16 — — 44.4% +0.61 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.26 2015 1767 136.4 -0.11 +0.13 0.976 49.7% -83 -165 +250 55.0% -0.22 2–5 (29%) 11–2 (85%) — +0.49
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1872 149.7 +1.33 -0.93 1.009 50.1% -84 -256 +228 52.4% +0.15 7–4 (64%) 9–11 (45%) — +1.44
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1754 138.7 +0.15 -2.13 0.929 49.1% +26 -152 +157 42.5% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 9–5 (64%) — +0.80
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1708 129.0 -0.69 -0.86 0.916 48.2% +41 — — 33.3% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.03
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1707 120.2 +0.99 -0.41 1.000 50.7% — -37 +125 54.5% +0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.13
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1668 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1629 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2116 154.2 +2.92 +0.94 1.100 51.7% +19 -269 -43 55.6% +0.38 99–65 (60%) 107–118 (48%) 103.9 +1.17 — 1930 140.6 +0.77 -1.60 0.946 49.2% -34 -161 +146 45.4% -0.20 54–57 (49%) 90–120 (43%) 97.9 -0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.