H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Mardy Fish vs Paul-Henri Mathieu H2H: 1-2

Paul-Henri Mathieu holds a 2–1 lead over Mardy Fish in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Paul-Henri Mathieu leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mardy Fish won the 2008 US Open second round 6-2 3-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mardy Fish
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Paul-Henri Mathieu
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 28, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mardy Fish #35 6-2 3-6 6-3 6-4 Paul-Henri Mathieu #25 Match data
Oct 17, 2007* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Paul-Henri Mathieu #21 6-3 2-6 7-5 Mardy Fish #38 Match data
Mar 8, 2007* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Paul-Henri Mathieu #63 7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(5) Mardy Fish #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,114 290 211 57.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Paul-Henri Mathieu #914 #12 2,000 1,961 268 297 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mardy Fish Paul-Henri Mathieu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0 2000 2–3 40.0% #275 1,487 0 0
19 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0 2001 0–2 0.0% #150 1,468 0 0
20 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0 2002 23–14 62.2% #36 1,838 0 2
21 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1 2003 16–23 41.0% #83 1,683 0 2
22 2004 21–17 55.3% #37 1,728 0 1 2004 9–10 47.4% #123 1,661 0 2
23 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,625 0 1 2005 26–27 49.1% #46 1,720 0 2
24 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,729 0 2 2006 23–28 45.1% #55 1,668 0 2
25 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,756 0 2 2007 45–23 66.2% #25 1,870 0 4
26 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,854 0 2 2008 29–25 53.7% #31 1,746 0 4
27 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,789 0 3 2009 28–29 49.1% #33 1,748 0 4
28 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,009 0 5 2010 10–19 34.5% #97 1,731 0 4
29 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,008 0 6 2012 14–17 45.2% #58 1,822 0 4
31 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,932 0 6 2013 6–19 24.0% #129 1,720 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2014 11–17 39.3% #96 1,759 0 4
33 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,882 0 6 2015 7–12 36.8% #95 1,761 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2016 18–20 47.4% #73 1,679 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2017 1–9 10.0% #249 1,574 0 4