H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Mardy Fish vs Pete Sampras H2H: 0-1
Pete Sampras holds a 1–0 lead over Mardy Fish in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pete Sampras leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 2002 Indian Wells Masters second round 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 44
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2002* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Pete Sampras | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Mardy Fish | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mardy Fish | #619 | #7 | 3,060 | 2,114 | 290 | 211 | 57.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Pete Sampras | #34 | #1 | 5,792 | 2,265 | 737 | 208 | 78.0% | 14 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 32 | 64 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mardy Fish | Pete Sampras | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #81 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #305 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 |
| 19 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #141 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 52–17 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,091 | 1 | 8 |
| 20 | 2002 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #3 | 2,118 | 1 | 13 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 82–15 | 84.5% | #1 | 2,126 | 3 | 21 |
| 22 | 2004 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 74–9 | 89.2% | #1 | 2,196 | 5 | 31 |
| 23 | 2005 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #225 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 66–17 | 79.5% | #1 | 2,134 | 7 | 36 |
| 24 | 2006 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #47 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 66–10 | 86.8% | #1 | 2,183 | 8 | 44 |
| 25 | 2007 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #1 | 2,187 | 10 | 52 |
| 26 | 2008 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #1 | 2,042 | 11 | 56 |
| 27 | 2009 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #55 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 38–9 | 80.9% | #3 | 2,117 | 12 | 61 |
| 28 | 2010 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #16 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 40–11 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,068 | 13 | 63 |
| 29 | 2011 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #8 | 2,012 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #10 | 2,003 | 13 | 63 |
| 30 | 2012 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #27 | 2,008 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 25–14 | 64.1% | #13 | 1,977 | 14 | 64 |
| 31 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #373 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #423 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |