H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mardy Fish vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 1-4

Radek Stepanek holds a 4–1 lead over Mardy Fish in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Radek Stepanek leads 4–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mardy Fish won the 2012 Cincinnati Masters fourth round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mardy Fish
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 17, 2012* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Mardy Fish #20 6-3 6-3 Radek Stepanek #37 Match data
Jan 7, 2011* Brisbane ATP 250 R16 Hard Radek Stepanek #62 6-3 6-1 Mardy Fish #16 Match data
Feb 15, 2009* San Jose ATP 250 F Hard Radek Stepanek #21 3-6 6-4 6-2 Mardy Fish #24 Match data
Aug 15, 2007* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Radek Stepanek #36 7-5 7-6(3) Mardy Fish #51 Match data
Jul 20, 2007* Los Angeles ATP 250 R16 Hard Radek Stepanek #101 6-2 6-2 Mardy Fish #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,114 290 211 57.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mardy Fish Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2004 21–17 55.3% #37 1,728 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,625 0 1 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,729 0 2 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,756 0 2 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,854 0 2 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,789 0 3 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,009 0 5 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,008 0 6 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,932 0 6 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,882 0 6 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5