H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mardy Fish vs Robby Ginepri H2H: 2-3

Robby Ginepri holds a 3–2 lead over Mardy Fish in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Robby Ginepri leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mardy Fish won the 2010 Atlanta fourth round 6-1 7-5.

USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 43 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 23, 2010* Atlanta ATP 250 R16 Hard Mardy Fish #49 6-1 7-5 Robby Ginepri #75 Match data
Feb 16, 2008* Delray Beach ATP 250 QF Hard Robby Ginepri #169 6-1 4-6 6-4 Mardy Fish #77 Match data
Jun 28, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Mardy Fish #86 6-3 6-2 6-4 Robby Ginepri #17 Match data
Apr 21, 2005* Houston ATP 250 R32 Clay Robby Ginepri #73 6-1 6-4 Mardy Fish #56 Match data
Feb 18, 2005* Memphis ATP 250 R16 Hard Robby Ginepri #77 6-1 7-5 Mardy Fish #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,114 290 211 57.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Robby Ginepri #1,221 #15 1,525 1,927 185 194 48.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mardy Fish Robby Ginepri
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0 2001 3–5 37.5% #175 1,521 0 0
19 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0 2002 6–12 33.3% #100 1,580 0 0
20 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0 2003 31–19 62.0% #32 1,789 0 1
21 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1 2004 19–24 44.2% #63 1,697 0 1
22 2004 21–17 55.3% #37 1,728 0 1 2005 37–23 61.7% #15 1,882 0 2
23 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,625 0 1 2006 23–24 48.9% #51 1,804 0 2
24 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,729 0 2 2007 11–20 35.5% #134 1,716 0 2
25 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,756 0 2 2008 25–19 56.8% #51 1,814 0 2
26 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,854 0 2 2009 13–18 41.9% #100 1,689 0 3
27 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,789 0 3 2010 8–12 40.0% #144 1,669 0 3
28 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,009 0 5 2011 2–4 33.3% #311 1,665 0 3
29 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6 2012 2–4 33.3% #287 1,598 0 3
30 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,008 0 6 2013 2–2 50.0% #214 1,639 0 3
31 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,932 0 6 2014 3–8 27.3% #223 1,700 0 3
33 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,882 0 6