H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Mardy Fish vs Tim Henman H2H: 1-0
Mardy Fish holds a 1–0 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mardy Fish leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mardy Fish won the 2003 Madrid Masters second round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 44
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2003* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mardy Fish | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Tim Henman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mardy Fish | #619 | #7 | 3,060 | 2,114 | 290 | 211 | 57.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mardy Fish | Tim Henman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #305 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #141 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2005 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #225 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2006 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #47 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2007 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2008 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2009 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #55 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2010 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #16 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2011 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #8 | 2,012 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2012 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #27 | 2,008 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #373 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 |
| 33 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #423 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |