H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Mardy Fish vs Tomas Zib H2H: 2-0

Mardy Fish holds a 2–0 lead over Tomas Zib in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mardy Fish leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mardy Fish won the 2006 Washington Open round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mardy Fish
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Tomas Zib
CZE Age 50 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mardy Fish #70 6-4 6-4 Tomas Zib #141 Match data Aug 3, 2006* R32 Washington Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Mardy Fish #54 7-6(2) 6-7(3) 6-3 Tomas Zib #77 Match data Mar 22, 2005* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,116 295 212 58.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Tomas Zib #1,339 #51 688 1,637 41 94 30.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mardy Fish Tomas Zib
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2004 26–18 59.1% #37 1,760 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #172 1,487 0 0
23 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,640 0 1 1999 4–4 50.0% #111 1,531 0 0
24 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,726 0 2 2000 5–13 27.8% #117 1,465 0 0
25 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,755 0 2 2001 3–11 21.4% #224 1,438 0 0
26 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,860 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,815 0 3 2003 1–5 16.7% #145 1,467 0 0
28 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,023 0 5 2004 3–8 27.3% #121 1,482 0 0
29 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6 2005 18–27 40.0% #59 1,558 0 0
30 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,012 0 6 2006 4–20 16.7% #133 1,509 0 0
31 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,935 0 6 2007 3–4 42.9% #138 1,535 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #416 1,545 0 0
33 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,885 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mardy Fish Tomas Zib
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 29 12 41 70.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 19 13 32 59.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
24 2006 12 14 26 46.2% 5 0 5 100.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2007 22 14 36 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2008 26 15 41 63.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 13 10 23 56.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2010 25 11 36 69.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 2004 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2011 33 17 50 66.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2005 8 13 21 38.1% 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2012 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2006 1 9 10 10.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2013 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 221 151 372 59.4% 24 29 53 45.3% 46 26 72 63.9% 4 6 10 40.0% — 20 42 62 32.3% 14 36 50 28.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 452/465 of Mardy Fish's and 123/134 of Tomas Zib's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mardy Fish Tomas Zib
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 58/61 11.0 3.9 53.4% 80.0% 52.0% 64.2% 39.2% 67.0% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 38/44 11.1 4.1 55.1% 77.2% 50.8% 65.1% 42.1% 65.4% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 17/17 10.3 3.4 53.9% 72.8% 46.5% 53.7% 34.0% 60.9% 34.2% 1999 6/8 5.3 2.3 64.3% 66.8% 49.9% 66.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.5%
24 2006 40/41 9.5 3.1 51.8% 78.8% 53.9% 68.1% 43.9% 66.5% 37.5% 2000 12/18 2.4 1.9 61.0% 63.4% 47.2% 58.4% 41.1% 57.0% 37.4%
25 2007 45/45 11.4 2.7 52.2% 80.1% 52.1% 55.7% 42.6% 66.5% 35.7% 2001 12/14 3.0 1.4 63.1% 65.7% 43.7% 41.2% 47.7% 57.7% 33.8%
26 2008 55/55 10.1 2.7 49.3% 77.9% 51.8% 57.6% 39.2% 64.6% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 37/38 11.0 2.3 56.9% 77.1% 53.3% 58.2% 44.0% 66.6% 36.9% 2003 6/6 2.3 2.0 57.8% 64.6% 50.3% 49.9% 22.2% 58.6% 27.5%
28 2010 52/53 10.9 2.3 55.3% 79.7% 54.6% 62.1% 49.8% 68.5% 38.1% 2004 11/11 3.8 2.1 56.9% 73.1% 55.6% 36.2% 24.5% 65.3% 34.6%
29 2011 64/64 7.6 1.7 58.4% 76.7% 55.4% 64.9% 44.7% 67.7% 39.4% 2005 44/45 3.7 1.9 57.7% 68.3% 50.5% 54.5% 43.5% 60.8% 34.9%
30 2012 31/32 9.7 2.5 52.2% 77.9% 55.4% 68.6% 51.3% 67.1% 39.8% 2006 24/24 4.3 2.1 56.5% 65.2% 48.6% 51.0% 32.7% 57.8% 31.1%
31 2013 9/9 5.8 3.1 49.6% 75.7% 47.6% 45.0% 44.4% 61.2% 37.2% 2007 7/7 3.4 1.7 59.2% 72.8% 47.8% 58.1% 55.7% 62.3% 31.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 12.0 5.0 62.6% 63.6% 51.9% 76.9% 31.6% 59.2% 37.3%
33 2015 6/6 8.3 3.8 52.2% 75.4% 46.3% 54.9% 43.2% 61.5% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 452/507 10.0 2.8 53.9% 78.1% 52.8% 61.7% 43.4% 66.3% 37.1% — 123/135 3.7 1.9 58.7% 67.4% 49.4% 52.0% 39.7% 59.9% 34.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mardy Fish Tomas Zib
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1524 106.9 — — — — -10 — +79 35.3% -1.29 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1543 124.2 — — — — +34 — +26 37.8% -0.54 5–4 (56%) 0–4 (0%) — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1630 123.4 — — — — +7 — -44 47.4% -0.32 4–3 (57%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1841 146.3 +3.97 -0.87 1.064 50.8% +36 -346 -162 57.3% +0.28 15–8 (65%) 18–18 (50%) — -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1761 139.2 +1.62 -0.32 1.019 50.7% +14 — -26 54.0% +0.36 12–5 (71%) 6–11 (35%) — +0.83 1998 1488 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.05
23 2005 1641 122.4 -1.17 -0.67 0.875 47.6% +31 — — 34.9% -0.84 4–0 (100%) 2–7 (22%) — -0.38 1999 1532 114.4 -0.88 +1.34 1.036 50.8% +42 -22 — 50.0% -0.25 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.15
24 2006 1727 137.0 +3.82 +0.31 1.121 52.1% -53 -159 +51 54.8% +0.55 6–5 (55%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.33 2000 1466 109.0 -2.45 -1.12 0.869 47.6% +77 +6 — 30.2% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.93
25 2007 1756 144.3 +2.76 +0.38 1.067 51.0% +30 -208 -75 50.5% +0.02 8–6 (57%) 11–13 (46%) — +0.23 2001 1438 104.1 -3.27 -2.71 0.797 46.2% +74 -29 +70 26.7% -1.27 0–2 0–4 (0%) — +0.84
26 2008 1861 148.1 +1.58 +0.64 1.033 50.7% +50 -274 -175 56.0% +0.36 10–6 (63%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.64 2002 1446 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 1816 145.3 +2.33 +0.49 1.105 51.8% +26 -197 -21 55.3% +0.47 5–8 (38%) 7–9 (44%) — -0.08 2003 1467 112.3 -1.03 -2.85 0.665 43.6% +18 — — 21.4% -2.14 — 2–1 (67%) — -0.14
28 2010 2023 156.7 +4.21 +2.02 1.209 53.0% +22 -393 -76 67.2% +0.98 10–6 (63%) 20–5 (80%) — +0.51 2004 1483 116.6 +0.88 -0.84 0.995 48.9% +57 -63 — 37.9% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.23
29 2011 2012 168.6 +4.73 +3.34 1.217 53.5% +6 -303 +46 64.1% +0.86 10–8 (56%) 14–10 (58%) — +1.88 2005 1559 125.5 -1.66 -2.16 0.889 48.0% -7 -52 -39 39.4% -0.58 5–4 (56%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.40
30 2012 2013 152.5 +3.05 +2.62 1.209 53.3% +23 — +55 61.5% +0.88 5–2 (71%) 8–8 (50%) — +2.93 2006 1510 117.1 -2.65 -3.89 0.738 44.8% -21 -33 +10 23.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.86
31 2013 1936 131.0 -1.70 +0.61 0.959 49.0% +18 — — 45.0% -0.10 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.20 2007 1536 109.9 -0.29 -0.67 0.843 47.8% -52 — — 38.9% -0.50 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.21
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1546 108.9 -2.23 -0.51 0.914 49.3% — — — 40.0% 0.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.06
33 2015 1885 133.8 -0.64 +1.74 1.060 51.0% +16 — — 44.4% +0.61 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.26 2009 1544 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2116 154.2 +2.92 +0.94 1.100 51.7% +19 -269 -43 55.6% +0.38 99–65 (60%) 107–118 (48%) 103.9 +1.17 — 1637 118.7 -1.72 -2.10 0.848 47.2% +15 -33 +1 33.9% -0.98 9–20 (31%) 21–28 (43%) 92.8 +0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.